Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+PACTOR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+PACTOR\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Pactor (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS-John); Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 00:24:20 -0500; Sri if off-topic. Besides an older version of RITTY, are there any soundcard programs that do PACTOR? Tnx; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-06/msg00197.html (6,259 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Pactor (score: 1): Author: pactor@pactor.com (Phil Sussman); Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 23:58:35 -0400; John, As far as I know, rather than the older MULTITERM software from BMK Multi, there was nothing other than RITTY that did PACTOR-1. RITTY removed PACTOR-1 in later releases. In any event, PACTOR-2; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-06/msg00206.html (6,952 bytes)
3. [RTTY] Pactor (score: 1): Author: holzbauer@bbnp.com (James Holzbauer); Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 00:54:08 +0000; I use an old MFJ 1278 TNC here. Have three but only one will run Pactor. Not sure where the dividing line is, but have made several Pactor qso's with that TNC...you can usually find them at hamfest.; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-06/msg00207.html (6,512 bytes)
4. [RTTY] PACTOR (score: 1): Author: "Thomas W4HM" <thomasfgiella@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:15:05 -0400; Since getting into the digital modes in 2003 I've been QRM'ed 100's of times by automatic PACTOR stations on most every HF band. That means 100's of busted QSO's, many that were very important for me; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00350.html (8,189 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:39:43 -0400; I am a member of the "Amateur Radio Pactor and Packet Group" on Yahoo and check their 'conversations' vis PACTOR-4 and RM-11708. These operators confine themselves to 14107-14112 range and do not ven; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00352.html (9,089 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:35:01 -0400; One needs to understand there is a major difference between an individual user leaving his radio/modem set up to accept messages on 14.107-14.125 and the commercial scale systems that scan 14.060 to; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00357.html (9,037 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:08:38 -0400; I agree and believe there are two separate problems: 1. Automatic or Semi-Automatic stations keying up or being keyed up on top of existing QSOs. I know this happens all the time. 2. Automatic or Sem; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00359.html (10,293 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:02:37 -0400; No, they are the same problem ... PACTOR lacks a competent "Channel Busy" detector to prevent the modem from transmitting if there is any activity on the frequency. The problem could resolved 100% if; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00363.html (11,424 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:35:33 -0400; Answer: The number of modems (SCS) sold for use for Amateur use is a small number. It is the duty of the operator to operate in a proper manner. (You can guess where this answer came from) AND Answer; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00367.html (12,676 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]