- 1. [RTTY] OK RTTY TEST (score: 1)
- Author: FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com (FireBrick)
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:10:20 -0600
- Looking at the rules, if I have this right. There are really two sets of rules. One set for cw/ssb which requires non OK stations to send a serial number and 2nd set for rtty which requires all stati
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-12/msg00080.html (6,671 bytes)
- 2. [RTTY] OK rtty test (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael Bazley" <bazley@iinet.net.au>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:29:17 +0800
- I hope to be able to spend a couple of hours on 80 and 40m. Seasons greetings, Mike VK6HD _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
- /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00126.html (6,149 bytes)
- 3. [RTTY] OK RTTY Test (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin J Prince <kevin@princ7.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:37:56 +0000
- CALLSIGN: G0NUP CATEGORY: SINGLE-OP ALL LOW RTTY CLAIMED-SCORE: 126280 CONTEST: OK-RTTY CREATED-BY: MixW 2.10 NAME: Kevin Prince POWER: 40Watts, Vertical antenna == Statistics for G0NUP (OKDXRTTY) QS
- /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00159.html (6,752 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu