Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Multiple\s+cables\s+on\s+1\s+core\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Multiple\s+cables\s+on\s+1\s+core\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Multiple cables on 1 core (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:55:10 -0700; HI all I'm re-doing some RTTY interfacing here in the shack and just wonder - can you use the same ferrite core for 2 different cables wound together? Sure would make for a neater lashup. Thanks and; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00142.html (6,408 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Multiple cables on 1 core (score: 1): Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:05:39 +0100; The supposed purpose of ferrite cores on interface leads is to suppress any stray common-mode RF currents between different parts of the system (most often, between the transceiver and the PC). In t; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00155.html (9,187 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Multiple cables on 1 core (score: 1): Author: "Ian White" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:45:59 +0100; Bostjan and I are doing the same thing practically, but we are thinking about it in two entirely different ways... and that difference is important. I meant exactly what I said! The most important ai; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-09/msg00156.html (13,873 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]