Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+More\s+on\s+tthe\s+\"gripe\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+More\s+on\s+tthe\s+\"gripe\"\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:06:18 -0000; Hi all, Someone (it may have been Jamie WW3S) wrote that N1MM can be configured to "automatically" send all spots while in S&P mode. If this is true, then this feature is a pain! N1MM really ought to; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00311.html (7,463 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:10:59 -0500; Technically, the option in N1MM is to spot all S&P contacts with stations that are not already in the bandmap, i.e. stations who have not been spotted on the frequency within the last 15 or 30 minute; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00313.html (8,010 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: Ed Steeble <esteeble@sc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:47:15 -0500; Phil, I disagree with your position. First, it is an option in N1MM Logger whether or not that "spot all S&P QSOs" is on or off, the default is off. While CQing spots are not automatically generated.; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00320.html (8,295 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:33:43 -0500; And I respectfully disagree with you. Taking it to the limit, what if everyone spotted all S&P QSOs? You say that "you can filter out most of the unwanted spots" but that's like saying "if you don't; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00321.html (10,073 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:46:40 -0000; Hi Ed (K3IXD), Thanks for the explanation, and yes, I can indeed now see why it is there. You wrote: <and I quote> "I disagree with your position. First, it is an option in N1MM Logger whether or not; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00322.html (8,939 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: radioman01 <radioman01@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:47:59 -0500; So i guess its ok for me to jump in on Ed's CQ freq and work a multi.? because the intent for the cluster network was for operators to spot a station that others might need... spotting a station on y; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00323.html (11,496 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:54:04 -0500; Frankly, that would seem an ideal situation for the assisted and multi-op stations who need the spots. After all, the whole point of having a spotting network is to have stations being spotted. Again; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00324.html (9,363 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:09:07 -0500; No one has suggested that spotting stations on your CQ frequency is a particularly bright idea. What has been pointed out is that there is a quite reasonable rationale for stations to spot all their; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00325.html (8,696 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: radioman01 <radioman01@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:45:16 -0500; Yeah, im with you on that Mike.. Owning a cluster, i don't see any issues with S&P spotting, either manual or automatic im happy enough your telling me where the multi is, should it matter how it was; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00326.html (9,807 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:13:19 -0500; Autospotting is a great idea.....and a great feature on a well written and supported piece of software.....I remember when they said SSB was a "bad" idea....that didnt catch on either.... ___________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00328.html (9,686 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: "Tom Homewood" <w1to@adelphia.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:27:00 -0500; At the risk of repeating what has been said, N1MM is not designed to spot stations on your run frequency! Jamie reported that this may have happened at some time in the past, it is not the way it wo; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00330.html (11,032 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:22:17 -0600; and I wish it hadn't! sorry, devil made me say dat. "my bad" I actually made a 'ssb' contact yesterday.... -- Oklahoma State Motto: Like The Play, Only No Singing -- Bill H. in Chicagoland webcams a; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00332.html (8,518 bytes)
13. [RTTY] More on tthe "gripe" (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:07:57 -0600; Phil Cooper - GU0SUP wrote, in part: "If I understand correctly, the "spot all S&P QSOs" does exactly that. I personally cannot comprehend any reason for spotting everything I work whilst in S&P mode; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00333.html (8,424 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]