Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+More\s+on\s+60\s+meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+More\s+on\s+60\s+meters\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] More on 60 meters (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:47:08 -0700; The ARRL has cleared up some of the confusion regarding the new allocations for 60 meters. Details here: http://www.arrl.org/news/60-meters-one-week-later It looks like even narrowband RTTY is still; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00045.html (6,927 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] More on 60 meters (score: 1): Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:56:32 -0700; The really good news is that the ARRL is putting out the info that lets it be useful to all US hams. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00046.html (7,064 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] More on 60 meters (score: 1): Author: "Charles Morrison" <cmorrison@lusfiber.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:12:16 -0500; Not that I've ever used 60M, but the part that confuses me is that RTTY is too wide of a signal for the channels, yet somewhere along the lines Pactor 3 with its potential to be the widest of them al; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00052.html (8,488 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] More on 60 meters (score: 1): Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 07:32:14 -0700; This is all pretty easy. 5 Mhz is for Emcomm use and not for much else. Thus Pactor 3 which is what they use in vast quanities. You can use SSB if you want to talk to your EOC or something. Otherwise; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00053.html (9,040 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]