Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Man\s+these\s+RTTYers\s+are\s+FAST\!\s+\-\s+Followup\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Man\s+these\s+RTTYers\s+are\s+FAST\!\s+\-\s+Followup\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Man these RTTYers are FAST! - Followup (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:22:04 -0500; Here's a follow-up regarding RTTY QSLing via LoTW. You may recall I said I had better than a 25% return rate in less than 24 hours after the chads had settled in the chad box (old timer). Last week I; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-07/msg00187.html (7,696 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Man these RTTYers are FAST! - Followup (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:39:02 -0700; Hi Bob My highest QSL counts from LOTW are from RTTY stations. I uploaded 15,750 Q's in the past month and got WAS RTTY and DXCC. Most of the WAS and DXCC cards are from RTTY op's. I am in pretty goo; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-07/msg00188.html (7,546 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Man these RTTYers are FAST! - Followup (score: 1): Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 22:00:07 -0400; Many are Fast but some are slow. Speaking about overseas LoTW users: I worked TG9AKH in the same NAQP RTTY. When I downloaded my Log (10 minutes after the end of the Contest), I FOUND TG9AKH QSL IN M; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-07/msg00189.html (9,040 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]