Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Macros\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Macros\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: kt_7g_macro@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:14:53 +0000 (UTC); I was trying to hack the macro sequence to send the received number back on the exchange like some were doing. It was a great double check. I Did not figure it out yet however. We did 2.5 mill f; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00246.html (6,967 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:41:51 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:14:53 +0000 (UTC), kt_7g_macro@comcast.net wrote: REPLY: Please do not do this. It is not necessary and can be confusing when there is QRM or QRN. I am sure a; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00247.html (6,918 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: "J. Edward $Ed$ Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:42:34 -0800; A number of stations do this but I do not recommend it, especially in the conditions we had this weekend. If you send your serial number twice in a row and the other station receives it the same eac; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00254.html (8,467 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:10:42 -0500; J. Edward (Ed) Muns wrote: "Now, having said this (for those interested in efficient contest exchanges), we all should be patient with and accommodate the new and/or casual participants who are addin; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00255.html (7,821 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:29:25 +0000; Perhaps we should be targeting the software authors instead? -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00258.html (7,989 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:45:35 -0500; Hi Ian, Targeting the software authors for what? 73 Art W2NRA "Keep to the Code!" w2nra.com -- Original Message -- From: "Ian White GM3SEK" <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk> To: <rtty@contesting.com> Sent: Tues; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00259.html (8,471 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:16:27 +0000; Default macros that show a better example for newcomers, and help promote good RTTY operating. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00260.html (9,323 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:51:10 -0500; A good idea, indeed. Besides the no-no for a macro repeating a received exchange back, I for one would also beg the software authors to never assign a F key for the QSO B4 message by default... If th; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00261.html (9,292 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:41:36 -0700; I will chime in on this one. Please do not do that. I struggled with more than one station doing that. That said, the exchanges seem to be getting better (shorter), for the most part. 73 John wa5zup; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00262.html (8,782 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: "Simon $HB9DRV$" <simon@hb9drv.ch>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:17:01 +0100; Not all authors are contesters, also many authors have little time for QSO's because they're - authouring :-) What would really help is a set of sample exchanges for the various contests. If you want; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00263.html (8,812 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: Simon S51D <s51d@hamradio.si>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:55:58 +0100; Ed, congrats for your score! And thanks guys for Qs... We were realy enjoy at this one. See you all in another one! 73's Simon S51D s51d@hamradio.si CQ WW RTTY WPX Contest Call: 4O3A Operator(s): 4O3; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00266.html (8,136 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:28:04 -0800; How true. And I am only writing code for a minor program in which there are all of 100 users. I am not a contester, either. Outside of last year's RTTY Roundup, I had made fewer than 50 QSO for the e; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00267.html (9,102 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: "Simon $HB9DRV$" <simon@hb9drv.ch>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:34:12 +0100; And the fact that someone (I) may add RTTY support to a program doesn't mean they (I) know much about RTTY operating practices :) Anyway - I've had good feedback to my request for RTTY macros, the ne; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00268.html (9,423 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: "Junior" <charlesw_anderso@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:41:00 -0800; Amen brother Shelby. My effort (total contacts) at the end of day would probably be about 70-75 percent less without the casual and new ops playing. They will learn in time like I did. Thanks to all; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00269.html (9,401 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:57:55 -0500; Hi Chen, I worked K5D on 20m and 30m in RTTY. 599 both times: 30 Meters <090215 14:46:57 RX> W2NRA W2NRA 599 W2NRA BK 20 Meters <090217 16:42:06 RX> W2NRA W2NRA 599 W2NRA BK _________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00270.html (10,059 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:04:01 -0500 (EST); Apparently the op who was sending 5NN was "Jerry". 73, doug Hi Chen, I worked K5D on 20m and 30m in RTTY. 599 both times: _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contes; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00271.html (9,070 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:11:03 -0700; I only had one station send me 5nn. Not that I made a ton of contacts but this is an improvement. Some people strung together the report and sn which was a pain 599005599005. What is the current feel; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00272.html (10,011 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:09:11 -0800; I printed Glenn sending a hello to Bob K0RC (and at least one other) last evening. Perhaps Bob can confirm if he saw that message. 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY m; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00273.html (8,520 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:01:46 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: N1MM Logger has the ability to separate out the report from the RST. If you click on 599001 it can pick out the "001". When all contest programs have that ability, that might; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00274.html (9,359 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:40:56 -0800; IMHO, a dash in between numbers is not bad. Others may not like the esthetics. A dash in between letters is not so good, "599 AZ-AZ" takes one extra FIGS and one extra LTRS to send. More letters = sl; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00275.html (11,202 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]