Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+MM\s+in\s+RU\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+MM\s+in\s+RU\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] MM in RU (score: 1): Author: "Tom Martin" <tmartin@chartermi.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:49:00 -0600; I would vote against MM in RU. Every year the bands, except 10 and 15 get, are becoming packed with RU participants. That's good. However, this year there were more stations operating above 14.120 th; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00086.html (7,756 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] MM in RU (score: 1): Author: k3mm@verizon.net; Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:15:43 -0600 (CST); Actually, I think MM in RU would help get more guys off of 20 meters to work the other bands, so if anything 20M crowding would improve. I'm all for anything that increases "other band" activity! Ty; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00092.html (8,453 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] MM in RU (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:59:24 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Location probably has something to do with it. I am in the southwest corner of the US, so it is single hop E layer to the middle of the country and single hop F2 to the east; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00096.html (7,555 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]