Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+LotW\s+WAS\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+LotW\s+WAS\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] LotW WAS? (score: 1): Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:54:48 -0500; Hi All, A while back there was talk about receiving RTTY WAS for strictly LotW QSLs. I just got an all WAS in the mail today and it didn't say LotW on it. Those who received WAS certificates strictly; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00052.html (6,253 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] LotW WAS? (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:28:41 -0800 (PST); No indication on the award, sorry. Give me your number and award date and I'll (eventually) add you to my web page: http://www.ad1c.us/HamRadio/rtty_was.htm 73 - Jim AD1C p.s. if anyone has a small i; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00054.html (7,685 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] LotW WAS? (score: 1): Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 22:11:43 -0500; No Art, they do not indicate it. Lotw is not a type of emission.. This is just for you (for me) and for all participants in LOTW Congratulations, BTW :) 2006/11/9, Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.n; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00055.html (7,671 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]