Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Logic\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Logic\?\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: aa0cy at quadnet.net (Bob Wanderer); Date: Mon Feb 10 22:55:38 2003; Dear Experienced RTTY Contesters: What is the logic behind sending QQ1Q 599 - 021 - 021 DE Q92X Thanks and 73, Bob AA0CY; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00158.html (7,083 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: W0YR at aol.com (W0YR@aol.com); Date: Tue Feb 11 06:46:32 2003; Bob, There are a lot of newer operators who think it's neat, smart or perhaps even time-saving to call you and send an exchange at the same time. Not only is this inadvisable, it causes QRM and puts; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00164.html (9,296 bytes)
3. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Tue Feb 11 07:09:28 2003; W0YR@aol.com wrote: "Exceptions to accepted operating practice in contests just wastes everyone's time." While I'm "generally" in agreement, I see absolutely no reason whatsoever, especially in margi; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00165.html (9,010 bytes)
4. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: wa9als at starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Tue Feb 11 07:10:40 2003; everyone's the I agree except - Those new to contesting haven't much idea about "how to do it" - Your approach probably just drives those potential new contesters away. I just try to work them and f; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00166.html (8,608 bytes)
5. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: jon at praxisworks.org (Jon Harder); Date: Tue Feb 11 07:40:49 2003; I interpreted Bob's question as relating to the exchange, and not to abuses on the the initial call. Assuming it was the former, I'll offer this comment. Although it has been discussed many times in; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00168.html (8,754 bytes)
6. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: w1to at adelphia.net (Tom Homewood); Date: Tue Feb 11 08:38:36 2003; Or they could be like me and hit the wrong macro key, did that more than once. 73, Tom, W1TO even; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00170.html (8,286 bytes)
7. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: jjreisert at alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Tue Feb 11 08:54:25 2003; One could argue that the RST acts as a "sync pulse". In the DSP/FFT world, copying is improved by having the same exact stream sent twice rather than a partial the second time around. 73 - Jim AD1C -; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00172.html (9,058 bytes)
8. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: jjreisert at alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Tue Feb 11 08:55:22 2003; My logic as well. I hate having to re-program F-keys on the fly. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00173.html (7,888 bytes)
9. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: w7ti at dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Tue Feb 11 09:50:43 2003; _________________________________________________________ There is - or should be - a difference between a CQ exchange and an S&P exchange. The S&P exchange should contain "QSL" or "TU" to acknowledg; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00174.html (8,276 bytes)
10. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: jon at praxisworks.org (Jon Harder); Date: Tue Feb 11 10:14:58 2003; Operating philosophies will always differ. Although the example I gave left it out, I do usually put a TU in my all-purpose exchange, as a friendly touch. Seems to me that when in S&P I go ahead to s; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00175.html (8,208 bytes)
11. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: w7ti at dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Tue Feb 11 10:54:05 2003; _________________________________________________________ I recommend not sending "TU" while running until you're really done and ready for the next guy. The problem is the ones that send their excha; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00176.html (8,618 bytes)
12. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: faunt at panix.com (Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604); Date: Tue Feb 11 11:28:42 2003; Err, I interpreted this as focusing on the "<space><dash><space>" between the numbers. What did you mean? 73, doug; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00177.html (8,339 bytes)
13. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: n4an at ala.net (Roy Dancy); Date: Tue Feb 11 12:45:13 2003; I5t also alerts others who are copying that this might be a station they want to call. Besides GOOD amateur practice calls for a complete exchange ie both calls in the exchange. 73 y'all RoY N4AN abu; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00186.html (10,869 bytes)
14. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: aa5au at bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Tue Feb 11 15:39:06 2003; I think we got away from the original thread a little bit (don't remember what that was anyway hi), but some excellent points have been brought up here. I did want to comment on something that rang a; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00189.html (10,169 bytes)
15. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: w7ti at dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Tue Feb 11 19:51:02 2003; _________________________________________________________ That will work if sigs are strong and there is no question who you are talking to, which is 99% of the time. When there's a pileup or QRM/QRN; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00198.html (8,285 bytes)
16. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: llindblom at juno.com (Larry L Lindblom); Date: Tue Feb 11 20:07:23 2003; when people sent the full exchange when I requested a fill invariably the call and 599 printed fine but the serial number would be #!% #!*. If the RST is something other than 599 yes please send it a; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00199.html (9,802 bytes)
17. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: aa0cy at quadnet.net (Bob Wanderer); Date: Tue Feb 11 20:58:19 2003; The law of unintended consequences has really reared its head on this one. However, I'm probably to blame for not discussing further the reason behind the question and what I was considering as illo; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00202.html (9,170 bytes)
18. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: wx4tm at direcway.com (Tom Moore); Date: Tue Feb 11 22:20:39 2003; I couldn't agree more.. While I'm sure the rtty contest community could never agree on the specific nitty gritties of all the possible variables for exact CQ and S&P responses, I do feel that we woul; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00205.html (9,430 bytes)
19. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: wa9als at starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Wed Feb 12 22:34:38 2003; I sent this this morning, but "Spamcop" bounced it! ?? subject out a all called I could see this coming, and it's a good idea. However, think about this - How do most of us know about Don's pages? We; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00224.html (11,028 bytes)
20. [RTTY] Logic? (score: 1): Author: faunt at panix.com (Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604); Date: Thu Feb 13 00:00:44 2003; I'll not be at Dayton this year (my wife is graduating from UC), but I think the best way to reach a bunch of RTTY ops is to send out an information sheet with the QSL's from a DXpedition that makes; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-02/msg00225.html (7,899 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]