- 1. [RTTY] Lids (score: 1)
- Author: "W5XB" <w5xb@att.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 20:58:55 -0500
- quite right, trying but missing the boat, thinking they are helping but are interfering, and of course, downright malicious. About three contests ago, I remember hearing one station trying and tryin
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00115.html (6,813 bytes)
- 2. [RTTY] LIDs (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 03:09:12 -0400
- One of the more unfortunate creations in our great hobby is the term "LID". Having a 3-letter mnemonic to slander our fellow enthusiasts does not advance radio sport, or ham radio in general. I'd lik
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00121.html (8,938 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] LIDs (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Perrin <n7mq@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 06:52:41 -0800
- Bravo, Ed! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00126.html (9,956 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] LIDs (score: 1)
- Author: Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 16:14:23 +0100
- Bravo, bravissimo! Giusto, giustissimo! Ed. That is quite heartily translated by google, not myself, as: Bravo, very good! Right, absolutely right! Ed. Salvo iw1ayd PS It's not anyway connected to Fi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00129.html (36,616 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] LIDs (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 12:32:04 -0600
- You mean this? http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op I sympathize to a point. As long as it stays here on the series of tubes that make up the interwebs, it just "is". Services like Gmail provide extremely flex
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00134.html (8,188 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu