Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+K5D\s+RTTY\s+Logging\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+K5D\s+RTTY\s+Logging\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: kh-phillips@9-5usa.org; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:35:37 -0600 (CST); Has anyone who worked K5D on RTTY had trouble with the contact(s) showing up in their log? I worked them 22 February on 17m around 2353Z. I let time pass but the contact did not show up in their onli; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00351.html (6,892 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:07:04 +0000; Hello Kh-phillips, Yes. I worked them on 40m on feb 24th but I am not in their online log. The next contact they made was with another italian station and that contact appears in the online log so I'; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00352.html (8,371 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:14:46 -0500; I made 2 RTTY contacts with them and both showed up fine following the site logs being updated. My RTTY contacts were in the 1st half of their operations. I know others in my club had all their RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00353.html (9,709 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:28:39 -0500; Hi Kevin, Nope! No trouble here. I worked 'em 5 bands on RTTY, 7 bands on CW and 6 bands on SSB and they all showed up. Never hear them on 10 or 12 though . . . dang it. One point in your favor is al; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00354.html (8,217 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: <w7pp@att.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:04:06 -0500; Kevin: I worked them on 40,30,20,17 and 15 and each of the contacts showed up OK.. Don't know why yours should be any different. Sorry to hear you missed them... Best 73 de Dick, W7PP _______________; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00355.html (7,008 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:43:13 -0800; Kevin, Interestingly, I'd made an RTTY contact with them just three minutes before you did on the same 22 Feb UTC date. I just did a log search at their web site and my contact does show up. If you s; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00356.html (8,255 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:51:17 -0600; Tried to work them on 30 RTTY, but they didn't hear me. Did work them on 15 RTTY and that Q showed up. Also got them on 17 and 80 phone and, amazingly, 30 CW (used CwGet and the memories in the 746 :; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00357.html (7,916 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:16:19 -0500 (EST); And I got them on nothing- too busy working all you people 6 times, I guess. 73, doug _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00358.html (7,500 bytes)
9. [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: Dick Kriss <aa5vu@att.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:11:57 -0600; Kevin KE5CQJ, I worded K5D on 8-bands (missed 24 MHz) and all three modes. My 10 meter SSB and 15 meter CW were missing for a few days then they showed up toward the end of the operation. You may wa; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00360.html (7,149 bytes)
10. [RTTY] K5D RTTY Logging (score: 1): Author: "Darl Deeds" <ddeeds@thewavz.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:57:51 -0500; I also had a 20 meter RTTY qso come up missing. I have two CW Qso's missing also and I made insurance contacts on them and they are also missing. I am going to QSL and hope for the best. DARL NA8W __; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00361.html (7,472 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY Logging (score: 1): Author: Alex Malyava <alex.k2bb@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:05:47 -0500; I had a "not sure" qso, so I called them once again 5-10 minutes later and got "you are in the log already"... guess what? none of them in the log :) _______________________________________________ R; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00362.html (8,584 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:10:27 -0600; K5D did a good job logging me 19 for 19 band/mode QSOs, including RTTY on 30, 20, 17, and 15. I didn't chase them on RTTY on 40. My first 30 meter RTTY QSO on Feb. 17 was a NIL (I only had partial pr; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00363.html (7,122 bytes)
13. [RTTY] K5D RTTY Logging (score: 1): Author: "Darl Deeds" <ddeeds@thewavz.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:38:08 -0500; I really love the on line logging when its used by a dxpedition. It saved me calling much more to make sure I was in the log and it gave more room to others that had not made or confirmed a contact.; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00364.html (7,984 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY Logging (score: 1): Author: Andrei Stchislenok <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:39:45 -0500; Thanks God I did not work'em on 20 meters RTTY :) Had one RTTY QSO on 40 and I am good there. -- 73's Andrei EW1AR-NP3D -- DXCC RTTY via LoTW only Who has what? - World Wide Rating Please visit: www.; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00368.html (8,882 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: John Grimm <john_grimm1450@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:43:19 -0500; I was fortunate enough to work K5D on 30 meters on 2/15 at 0652. The next day I checked the online log, and was surprised to see both that QSO and another QSO that I supposedly had on 2/13 at 1600. C; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00369.html (8,558 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:08:54 -0700; This is all getting a little old. The only ones who can help you are the QSL manager, and possibly the K5D operators. Wait until they get back home, send your QSL card and see what happens. The web s; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00370.html (7,444 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] K5D RTTY logging (score: 1): Author: Art W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:34:31 -0500; A "QSO that you supposedly had on 2/13 at 1600"? How do you know the date and time of the QSO that you didn't have? They don't give the date and time info in the online log. 73, Art W2NRA "Keep to th; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00371.html (8,286 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]