Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+JARTS\s+results\s+2009\.\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] JARTS results 2009. (score: 1)
Author: "Julio VE3FH" <ve3fh@yahoo.ca>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:40:35 -0500
Hello, Has anybody been listed in the wrong category in the JARTS 2009 results? I entered SOABLP and I am listed as a high power entry. Their rules (http://jarts.web.fc2.com/2010/rules2010.html) read
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00018.html (6,771 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] JARTS results 2009. (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:08:36 -0500
I submitted my log as SINGLE-OP ALL LOW as well and I'm listed in the High Power category as low. I checked both 2009 & 2010 cabrillo logs and they show LOW in the category. The JARTS contest uses a
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00021.html (8,052 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] JARTS results 2009. (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:55:43 -0500
Received the following response to my email about being categorized incorrectly. Dear David / K2DSL Hello David. And sorry for wrong category. I checked your original log, then I confirmed your categ
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00038.html (9,061 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] JARTS results 2009. (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 08:49:34 -0500
David, Once upon a time, many years ago, the RTTY contests were conducted in a gentlemanly fashion and the results were not so 'fixed in stone' that an obvious error could not be corrected. Today, so
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00039.html (10,511 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] JARTS results 2009. (score: 1)
Author: "Julio VE3FH" <ve3fh@yahoo.ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:47:35 -0500
David, I received an almost identical response from the JARTS folks: "Hello Julio, Sorry, I missed. I checked another log... I confirmed your category was Class-B... Something wrong about it... But t
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00040.html (10,463 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] JARTS results 2009. (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:53:40 -0500
Which, IMHO, is a very good reason for posting preliminary results, for all to see, prior to posting final results? C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW -- Original Message -- From: "David Levine" <david@levinecentra
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00041.html (10,637 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] JARTS results 2009. (score: 1)
Author: "Julio VE3FH" <ve3fh@yahoo.ca>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:08:29 -0500
That's not going to prevent any sponsor from screwing up the log processing. 73, Julio VE3FH all and they have selected results? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00094.html (11,050 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu