Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+JA\s+RTTY\s+on\s+80\s+during\s+the\s+CQWW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+JA\s+RTTY\s+on\s+80\s+during\s+the\s+CQWW\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] JA RTTY on 80 during the CQWW (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:31:20 -0700; Effective this year JA RTTY ops may operate between 3520 and 3575 KHz. It used to be 3520-3530KHz. (They can also operate a range above 3599 but squeezing into that 1KHz sliver for US ops seems like; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00111.html (7,276 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] JA RTTY on 80 during the CQWW (score: 1): Author: 7L4IOU <ncb02761@nifty.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:20:47 +0900; Hello Jeff, JA RTTY band plan on 80m is as you understand, and I agree that your approach is the rational. I will QSP your mail to our (JARTS) mailing list. 73, Hisami 7L4IOU Effective this year JA R; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00118.html (7,821 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] JA RTTY on 80 during the CQWW (score: 1): Author: John Grimm <john_grimm1450@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:31:33 -0400; Can't speak for 80 but it was GREAT being able to work so many JAs above 7045 on 40M. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00129.html (6,946 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] JA RTTY on 80 during the CQWW (score: 1): Author: Cheryl Whitlock <cherwhit@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:59:08 -0500; _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00130.html (7,758 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] JA RTTY on 80 during the CQWW (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:40:01 -0700; Thank you Hisami-san. I would be very interested in hearing their responses. 73 jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/ Facebook ~ http://www.face; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00134.html (9,403 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] JA RTTY on 80 during the CQWW (score: 1): Author: Lee Sawkins <ve7cc@shaw.ca>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:35:20 -0600 (MDT); Hi Jeff I made a handful of contacts with JA on 80. The activity by JA on 80 was very poor every though propagation was good. I only had 2 answer my CQs. These were on 3599.5. I also worked a couple; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00143.html (9,224 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] JA RTTY on 80 during the CQWW (score: 1): Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:56:49 -0400; Thanks, Lee. Good data. It's hard to know where to transmit when we don't where they are listening. But, it sounds like the larger issue is that few to none are listening, hi. Maybe Hisami-san ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00146.html (10,592 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] JA RTTY on 80 during the CQWW (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:11:08 -0700; That is helpful - thanks! In last year's JARTS contest I logged 37 JAs on 80. So they are around. ;) 73 jeff wk6i@W7RN -- Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.co; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00148.html (10,931 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] JA RTTY on 80 during the CQWW (score: 1): Author: Lee Sawkins <ve7cc@shaw.ca>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:20:09 -0600 (MDT); Hi Ed. I love operating on 80. During many contests I am SO2R all night long on 40 and 80 as they are the only bands open up here. I think the best is for the JA stations to operate 3575 and down and; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00149.html (11,212 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]