Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+It\s+felt\s+like\s+MMTTY\s+under\s+N1MM\s+was\s+sending\s+slowly\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+It\s+felt\s+like\s+MMTTY\s+under\s+N1MM\s+was\s+sending\s+slowly\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] It felt like MMTTY under N1MM was sending slowly (score: 1): Author: "k0bx@arrl.net" <k0bx@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:09:39 -0800 (PST); MMTTY has a feature that slows down the output rate of the characters send. This is what the old UT-4's did. It for slow typest that wanted to get ahead of the buffer. In MMTTY plugin, go to options; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00242.html (8,298 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] It felt like MMTTY under N1MM was sending slowly (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:20:32 -0500; Character wait and Diddle Wait will certainly slow down MTTY. "Digital Output" does not as verified by others. However, there is one other possibility that does not necessarily involve MMTTY. If the; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00252.html (10,744 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]