Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+IS0R\s+\&\s+75\s+baud\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+IS0R\s+\&\s+75\s+baud\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] IS0R & 75 baud (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Le Fouler - F6AOJ" <f6aoj@orange.fr>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 13:58:59 +0200; Hi, in order to increase qso rate in dxpedition IS0R will run 75 baud on 20m today note : due to rig on site split is very small basicly 300 to 1300 Hz Up http://is0r.perso.sfr.fr/cariboost1/ http://; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-05/msg00015.html (6,692 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] IS0R & 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 11:31:38 -0600; Does anyone really believe that changing to a non-standard baud rate will actually INCREASE rate? Or will it just increase confusion?; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-05/msg00019.html (7,234 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] IS0R & 75 baud (score: 1): Author: "WS7I" <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 10:57:10 -0700; You are of course right, Jim. 75 Baud RTTY will enable this expedition to work at least 1 QSO per hour. There will be a huge decrease in any foreign contacts as most will not even figure out the 100; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-05/msg00020.html (8,157 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] IS0R & 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 11:38:30 -0700; Yep, unlike the P5/4L4FN case (50 baud), you will need to use a wider filter for this one. Perhaps something around 90 Hz wider than the narrowest filter that you could use for "regular" RTTY. Jay is; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-05/msg00023.html (7,576 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] IS0R & 75 baud (score: 1): Author: "Scot, K9JY" <scot@k9jy.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 13:14:36 -0500; None of this will increase the rate...this time. But when will the "standard" baud rate ever get deemed as too slow? In the year 2525? I'm sure it will tick a whole bunch of people off, but having DX; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-05/msg00024.html (8,867 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] IS0R & 75 baud (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 11:05:15 -0700; Perhaps the objective is to reduce the size of the pile, HI HI. RTTY riff-raffs won't know how to copy them; unfortunately I suspect that some will call anyway. We'll see if their rates actually drop; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-05/msg00025.html (8,018 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] IS0R & 75 baud (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:16:05 -0400; Maybe I missed it, but what is so "special" about IS0R? I worked two IS0 stations, over the weekend. Also, I suppose I'm a "RTTY riff-raff", as I have no interest in 75 baud? C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW ____; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-05/msg00027.html (7,504 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] IS0R & 75 baud (score: 1): Author: James Colville <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 18:30:56 -0700; It will only do the latter. 73 Jim W7RY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-05/msg00029.html (8,495 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] IS0R & 75 baud (score: 1): Author: "Charlesjr@afgimail.com" <Charlesjr@afgimail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 08:03:41 -0400; Jeff, Thanks. Hope condx better today for some 75b. Hopefully it will get through the big EU pileup's faster for us W's. 73 charles/kk5oq in order to increase qso rate in dxpedition IS0R will run 75; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-05/msg00030.html (8,474 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]