Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+IC\-7200\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+IC\-7200\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] IC-7200 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 14:57:39 -0800; Is anyone on the list using an Icom IC-7200 for RTTY contesting? Gonna get a new rig here and this is one of the ones I'm looking at. The filtering setup looks pretty good. I know a K-3 or FT-9000 wo; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00007.html (7,025 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] IC-7200 (score: 1): Author: Mark Perrin <n7mq@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:10:54 -0800; Look for clean 756 Pro 2 and add the INRAD roofing filter. Way better radio than IC 7200, and great for contesting and DXing. 73, Mark N7MQ Gonna get a new rig here and this is one of the ones I'm lo; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00008.html (6,809 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] IC-7200 (score: 1): Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 16:24:18 -0800; Nah.... For casual contesting, the 7200 is a good choice. I've had several of them, but did not contest with it. I did run it on RTTY and it worked great. The built in sound card is pretty cool. Radi; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00009.html (8,582 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] IC-7200 (score: 1): Author: Mark Perrin <n7mq@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 16:26:20 -0800; Nah, just another opinion maybe, but not "nah." Tom is more serious than an IC 7200. IMHO, of course. Nah? For casual contesting, the 7200 is a good choice. I've had several of them, but did not cont; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00010.html (8,742 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]