Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+I\s+had\s+a\s+reply\s+in\s+the\s+contest\s+from\s+a\s+fellow\s+using\s+cw\s+for\s+rtty\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+I\s+had\s+a\s+reply\s+in\s+the\s+contest\s+from\s+a\s+fellow\s+using\s+cw\s+for\s+rtty\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] I had a reply in the contest from a fellow using cw for rtty (score: 1): Author: bill <bill@w9ol.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:49:12 -0600; and it was awful I don't know if he was using a keyboard to send the cw or actually using a paddle/keyer whatever. Maybe he couldn't type or spell. I finally asked him: "Are you using cw to send rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00184.html (8,307 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] I had a reply in the contest from a fellow using cw for rtty (score: 1): Author: "Rick" <RickPalio@att.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 16:57:45 -0800; I remember back in the days of SPARK we had to CW ID on rtty but we sent everything RTTY with just the ID, for the FCC, in CW. Anybody else remember that ? Rick - WU6W and it was awful I don't know i; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00186.html (9,691 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] I had a reply in the contest from a fellow using cw for rtty (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:10:15 -0800; He is probably using a K3, Bill. In fact, if you think back, was the "9" of your call sign slightly delayed? The K3 has this abortion (there is no other way to describe it) where you place the rig in; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00189.html (8,595 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] I had a reply in the contest from a fellow using cw for rtty (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:14:55 -0500; How do you send cw for rtty? I have (rarely) had cross-mode contacts where I was on rtty and got a response from a cw op, but that is not what you had, right? Jerry W4UK At 07:49 PM 2/10/2013, bill w; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00190.html (10,097 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] I had a reply in the contest from a fellow using cw for rtty (score: 1): Author: Arliss <w7xu@iw.net>; Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:47:10 -0600; Yes, I remember that. That was back in the days when I had a Model 15, a CV-89A TU and the Drake B Twins. Besides IDing on RTTY, you were required (on HF) to ID with telegraphy. You could use CW or F; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00208.html (9,111 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] I had a reply in the contest from a fellow using cw for rtty (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 21:14:01 -0800; Yes, you definately didn't want to start printing CW with the mark signal in the middle of a picture being received :-) 73 Tom W7WHY Besides IDing on RTTY, you were required (on HF) to ID with telegr; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00209.html (9,671 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]