Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+How\s+about\s+a\s+160m\s+RTTY\s+High\s+Speed\s+Sprint\?\s+$was\s+RTTY\s+on160Meters$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+How\s+about\s+a\s+160m\s+RTTY\s+High\s+Speed\s+Sprint\?\s+$was\s+RTTY\s+on160Meters$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (was RTTY on160Meters) (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Don" <ad0k@inbody.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:29:18 -0500; Sure...I would give it a shot. 73, Don ADØK http://ad0k.net http://inbody.net/weather RNARS 4774 This thread reminds me about... Around 1998 and 1999 I sponsored a short 4-hour RTTY contest ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00411.html (10,493 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (was RTTY on160Meters) (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:47:15 -0600; Okay I see my memory is failing me again (my mother told me it would only get worse)... The High Speed Sprint was run and scored using the SARTG rules, not BARTG as I previously stated. The SARTG rul; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00413.html (8,216 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] How about a 160m RTTY High Speed Sprint? (was RTTY on160Meters) (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:01:53 -0500; Do you get to rework stations? I think you'll run out of stations to work pretty quick otherwise... How about including 40 and 80? ...or at least 80? 0200Z is probably way too early for the left coas; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00423.html (10,977 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]