Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+How\s+I\s+worked\s+VK0EK\s+from\s+NA\s+on\s+15M\s+RTTY\s+this\s+morning\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Gauthier \(K8UT\)" <K8UT@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:25:42 -0400
I don't want this to sound like a "brag tape," but with only 5 days left in this DXpedition there are probably lots of other RTTY ops out there who are getting as nervous as I was about working VK0EK
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00016.html (9,408 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:17:43 +0100
That's very odd .. or maybe a typo? They have been running on 21097, not 21079, and working split down, not up, when I have seen them. Well done on making the QSO; I am still camping out! John GW4SKA
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00017.html (10,606 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: "G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 14:25:54 -0500
I managed to work them on RTTY 15m at 1154utc yesterday(4th April) 21094.10 QSX 21096.97 73 David G3YYD That's very odd .. or maybe a typo? They have been running on 21097, not 21079, and working spl
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00018.html (11,177 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 18:35:34 +0000
Hearing them has been a nightmare from upstate NY with my little pistol antennas. I managed to work them on 30m CW using lots of attenuation and a K9AY loop that's obviously not a 30M receive antenna
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00019.html (11,698 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:44:00 +0000 (UTC)
VK0EK has not been easy to work for many in the USA and it probably has to do with the 9000' volcano blocking the central US. Because the team elected not to set up a station on Spit Bay (or whatever
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00022.html (14,269 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: John Grimm <john_grimm1450@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 20:09:26 +0000
Pretty amazing but I don't know of *any* station in CO that has worked VK0EK above 20 meters. None. And very few have been able to work them on RTTY. Tough sledding for sure. ________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00023.html (7,475 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 16:30:20 -0400
Still trying to work them on 20M here in NY. They had a decent signal this afternoon on 20M CW, but couldn't break through the European pileup. 73, N2TK, Tony Pretty amazing but I don't know of *any*
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00024.html (7,598 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: John Bastin <bastinj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 18:13:31 -0400
Don, I realize Im 1000 miles north of you, but our experience here the last two nights has been for both FT4JA and VK0EK to come up from nothing to reasonably good copy on 30 meters between 0230 and
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00025.html (9,039 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:36:40 +0100
It's not just USA that is struggling with VK0EK. They have been printable here twice on 15 and once on 40, with huge pile-ups, and soon faded down in the noise. RTTY seems to have been on just the 2
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00030.html (15,882 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:57:00 -0400
Since the K5P operation, one UK amateur radio supplier has told me that he will never sponsor another US-led dxpedition. 75K contacts, only 11% with Europe, and just 864 of those on RTTY. Not good en
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00031.html (10,173 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:02:53 +0000
I'm kind of inclined to agree. If you're going to pitch something (and I know this will upset some people), don't operate on 160M. Antennas are a problem for a portable operation; hearing is a proble
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00032.html (17,748 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 14:32:58 -0400
Not going to happen ... with DXCC Challenge being what it is, there is no what that a major DXpedition is going to forgo 160 and 6 meters if the rules in the territory permit operation on those bands
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00036.html (11,379 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this morning (score: 1)
Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:51:22 -0500
The problem is that these DXpeditions solicit money before the trip. For VK0EK, I believe my club may have donated $500 or something like that. Then we get this kind of response for RTTY and we wonde
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00038.html (13,529 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu