Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+How\s+I\s+worked\s+VK0EK\s+from\s+NA\s+on\s+15M\s+RTTY\s+this\,\s+morning\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+How\s+I\s+worked\s+VK0EK\s+from\s+NA\s+on\s+15M\s+RTTY\s+this\,\s+morning\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this, morning (score: 1): Author: Frank Fallon <n2ff@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 16:41:11 +0000; It is really disappointing to see only 3% of their activity on digital modes. I am only looking for them RTTY as I have a CW QSO on 20 from a past operation. It appears that once again an expensive o; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00033.html (7,162 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this, morning (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:25:59 -0700; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Too often, RTTY seems to be an afterthought for DXPeditions. Not criticizing this one because I haven't heard them yet, but past operations have had oper; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00035.html (8,460 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] How I worked VK0EK from NA on 15M RTTY this, morning (score: 1): Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 22:59:21 +0100; Too often, RTTY seems to be an afterthought for DXPeditions. Not criticizing this one because I haven't heard them yet, but past operations have had operators who are new to RTTY and obviously inexpe; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00037.html (8,436 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]