Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+HK0NA\s+\-\s+is\s+there\s+no\s+SSB\/CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+HK0NA\s+\-\s+is\s+there\s+no\s+SSB\/CW\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] HK0NA - is there no SSB/CW (score: 1): Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:09:25 -0500; At 2100z Friday (2/3) HK0NA was running RTTY on 14080, 18100.1, and 21081.6 simultaneously. Is this a first ever for a dxpedition? Is someone running SO3R, or are they just trying the ultimate "spead; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00057.html (7,008 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] HK0NA - is there no SSB/CW (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:52:52 -0500; No, HK0NA was rather heavily oriented to CW and SSB operation early in their time on the island. It was not unusual to hear them on both CW and SSB across four or five bands with nary a signal on RT; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00058.html (7,536 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] HK0NA - is there no SSB/CW (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:14:37 -0800; I just saw the 15m op send JA2VHO TU HKØNA DWN DWN I watched the waterfall, and the big pile of JA was still calling above him. Any one who called down would have grabbed an easy QSO. He went back to; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00060.html (6,768 bytes)
4. [RTTY] HK0NA - is there no SSB/CW (score: 1): Author: "ko1h" <ko1h@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:56:58 -0800; Well it must be my fault. On Thursday I they were spotted on 30m cw. So I posted a spot that in essance said 10140 hk0na rttypse Not a few hours later they were on rtty all over the place. As stated; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00063.html (7,845 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]