Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Fwd\:\s+IARU\s+BEACONS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Fwd\:\s+IARU\s+BEACONS\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Fwd: IARU BEACONS (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:56:08 -0700; Just passing this along.... We just received this while running on 20M WAE-RTTY. As penance, Im passing it on the our contest community. -- Calling AFSK on: -14.098.74 -16:29 GMT is jamming the IAR; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00066.html (7,179 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: IARU BEACONS (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:31:17 -0500; When I monitor the beacons with FAROS, my bandwidth is set to 400 Hz and everything works FB. I think a +/- 1.5 KHz window is a waste of bandwidth, especially on a contesting weekend. Jerry W4UK ____; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00067.html (9,097 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: IARU BEACONS (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:49:21 -0800; 3KC? What software are they listening to the beacon with? Since when do you need software to listen to a beacon??? I can hear the beacons just fine with my bandwidth set to 250 cycles. on my TS-450SA; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00068.html (9,195 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: IARU BEACONS (score: 1): Author: John Merrill <johnn1jm@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:50:48 -0700; I would think on a contest weekend, with all the contest signals that would be beacon enough. I can certainly see beacons when things are quiet. The beacon guys have a loosing battle and should give; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00069.html (8,633 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: IARU BEACONS (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:35:23 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Agreed. I give the beacons +/- about 200 Hz. If that's not enough, someone needs a better RX. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00070.html (8,123 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: IARU BEACONS (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:45:14 -0500; Absolute *GARBAGE!* Nobody needs more than 400 KHz (+/- 200 Hz) for *CW* beacons. Any (FSK) RTTY signal (mark frequency) below 14.099.700 or above 14.100.470 should be just fine. For AFSK "carrier" f; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00071.html (9,345 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: IARU BEACONS (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:35:17 -0600; The beacons operate 24/7 on a fixed frequency and don't command any more protection that the rest of the users....make sure they are not in your passband plus a bit and don't worry about it. The only; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00074.html (9,830 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]