Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Fw\:\s+ARLB025\s+ARRL\s+seeks\s+comment\s+ondraft\s+\"Bandwidth\"\s+petition\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Fw\:\s+ARLB025\s+ARRL\s+seeks\s+comment\s+ondraft\s+\"Bandwidth\"\s+petition\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB025 ARRL seeks comment ondraft "Bandwidth" petition (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:30:35 -0700; On Aug 25, 2004, at 7:07 PM, Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 wrote: Maybe we should ask for .065 (or maybe .070) as the lower limit for 500Hz BW on 15 and 10, as well as on 20, just to make things e; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00284.html (9,242 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB025 ARRL seeks comment ondraft "Bandwidth" petition (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:33:05 -0400 (EDT); .065 on 20m might be a hardship for the PSK31 folks. Whenever you change rules, it is going to make someone unhappy. I think we have to suggest tweeks that will make everyone less unhappy, if possibl; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00285.html (10,395 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Fw: ARLB025 ARRL seeks comment ondraft "Bandwidth" petition (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:35:32 -0700; On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:33:05 -0400 (EDT), Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 wrote: _________________________________________________________ Does anyone know the reason for such a strange assignment i; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00286.html (9,383 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]