Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Field\s+Day\s+Digital\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Field\s+Day\s+Digital\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Field Day Digital (score: 1): Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 14:35:54 -0400; I am not surprised that PSK affords more activity on Field Day than RTTY. As mentioned, it is just much simpler to train digitally inexperienced hams to punch a couple of buttons and make some Qs, wi; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00025.html (6,995 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Field Day Digital (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:03:50 -0500; Personally, I found it to be more difficult to contest with PSK31 than with RTTY. Using the N1MM logger and flDigi engine, the technique as I was watching a relatively new ham work, was to open up th; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00027.html (9,271 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Field Day Digital (score: 1): Author: "Douglas McDuff" <w4ox@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 21:53:19 +0100; While some might consider it "blasphemy," our group (operating as 3A SFL) made the decision not to include RTTY or PSK. We tried briefly, but ultimately we made far too many Q's on CW to candidly was; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00028.html (8,146 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]