Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Exchange\s+Length\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Exchange\s+Length\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Exchange Length (score: 1): Author: Dave Barr <vzevhlnw@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:40:33 -0500; Talk about long? Here a short one. Several times I noticed a complete exchange like this: WA. No calls, no rst, no repeat, no string of periods and probably no line feed. For anonymity, it wasn't WA,; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00073.html (6,891 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Exchange Length (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:00:08 -0600; RST is silly, given that everyone sends 599, but it *is* part of the exchange. Good that there are no referees. :-) OK a few insist that 5NN is shorter. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Trav; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00087.html (7,342 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Exchange Length (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:06:19 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Actually, 5NN takes slightly longer because of the extra LTRS shift. It's no big deal, just a carryover from CW. 73, Bill W6WRT ______________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00097.html (7,447 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Exchange Length (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:39:06 -0600; I know ... makes it plain that the folks that use it aren't really up on what they are doing. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ______________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00103.html (7,373 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]