- 1. [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
- Author: "James" <semaj@suwanneevalley.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:12:57 -0400
- Reversed Signal. I am confused. My RTTY Elmer some 34 years ago Said that the "standard" was LSB on all bands. FSK was the best way to send RTTY. AFSK is O K if you do it right. I built a two Xtal to
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00162.html (7,191 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 22:47:32 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ The only real standard that should be adhered to is that the RF MARK frequency should be higher than the RF SPACE frequency. How you get ther
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00164.html (7,144 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
- Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:24:07 -0700
- On Oct 15, 2004, at 5:12 PM, James wrote: Reversed Signal. I am confused. My RTTY Elmer some 34 years ago Said that the "standard" was LSB on all bands. The only Amateur standard I know of is the one
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00165.html (7,554 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
- Author: dj3iw@t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz)
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:48:38 -0000
- Unless people start spotting the suppressed carrier frequency displayed on their fancy rigs as "the" frequency on the DX-Clutsers. 73 de Goetz dj3iw@t-online.de ______________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00166.html (6,989 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 04:42:23 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ Good point. The correct frequency to spot is the frequency of the MARK signal as it is transmitted. When using AFSK, whatever the radio dial
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00167.html (7,323 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:20:33 -0400
- I agree with everything Bill, Chen and Goetz have just posted, and would like to add one more comment: AFAIK, by far the easiest way to get your TX and RX out of whack with each other is to use FSK w
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00168.html (9,593 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
- Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 08:35:34 -0500
- hmmmm, that's not been my experience at all Richard. I use a FT1000MP which has a menu bug. You have to set the menu to 'reverse' for it to send FSK right side up. Now I do use MMTTY, both stand alon
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00169.html (10,740 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 11:23:06 -0400
- At 09:35 AM 16/10/2004, FireBrick wrote: hmmmm, that's not been my experience at all Richard. I use a FT1000MP which has a menu bug. You have to set the menu to 'reverse' for it to send FSK right sid
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00170.html (9,923 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
- Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:31:56 -0700
- On Oct 16, 2004, at 6:20 AM, Richard Ferch wrote: In particular, I believe recent Kenwood and Yaesu radios assume the opposite polarity to the one assumed by JE3HHT in MMTTY, so on these radios you h
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00171.html (9,265 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu