Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Comments\s+On\s+The\s+IC\s+746Pro\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Comments\s+On\s+The\s+IC\s+746Pro\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Comments On The IC 746Pro (score: 1): Author: k8qm@arrl.net (George McCrary); Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 22:46:10 -0500; Hello, I'm thinking about sidelining the TS850, and have been considering the 746Pro. Any comments on the rig for DXing and Contesting in general and on RTTY in particular? Thanks for any input, Geor; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00045.html (7,162 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Comments On The IC 746Pro (score: 1): Author: geo@onepost.net (George McCrary); Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 22:43:22 -0500; Hello, I'm thinking about sidelining the TS850, and have been considering the 746Pro. Any comments on the rig for DXing and Contesting in general and on RTTY in particular? Thanks for any input, Geor; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00046.html (7,183 bytes)
3. [RTTY] Comments On The IC 746Pro (score: 1): Author: jmerrill1@adelphia.net (John L Merrill); Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 23:16:15 -0500; I would stick with the 850. It has a much better receiver. John N1JM Hello, I'm thinking about sidelining the TS850, and have been considering the 746Pro. Any comments on the rig for DXing and Contes; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00047.html (8,049 bytes)
4. [RTTY] Comments On The IC 746Pro (score: 1): Author: gbaron@charter.net (Gil Baron); Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 22:27:38 -0600; I did not realize that. How does the TS870 receiver compare? Where do you get that information, is it a personal opinion or is it the result of lab tests? To: <rtty@contesting.com>; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00048.html (9,096 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]