Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+CQ\s+to\s+accept\s+EQSL\s+for\s+awards\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Smith" <kt_7g_macro@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:14:44 -0800
I have used both EQSL and LOTW for a few years now. I have also used them for expedition calls (zk1, vp5, v31) and the big difference that I see in the two systems are what happens when you submit a
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00382.html (7,625 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:54:04 -0600
With eQSL or LoTW? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! No Trillion-dollar blank check for crooks! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00386.html (7,287 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:11:33 -0600
Contacts only "show up" on eQSL. I could upload 100 contacts into LoTW with you, but if your log doesn't match any of my records, you will never know they are there. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN __________
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00387.html (8,851 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:22:49 -0600
That's what I thought - the way you wrote it wasn't clear and I couldn't figure out how you'd engineer that with LoTW, since LoTW is "blind". I see when I search for my call on eQSL, I seem to have h
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00394.html (8,181 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:00:29 -0600
Peter, First, I didn't start the thread, I just jumped in with the clarification about requests "showing up". On eQSL you cannot see the other stations log. BUT you can see any cards they sent to you
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00397.html (13,017 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: Gedking@aol.com
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:18:55 EST
HMMM that must be why I get so many B4's working a contest, (any contest) I work one station and somebody close by thinks I worked him. then when I try to work him he gives me B4. That's why I don't
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00398.html (8,037 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:18:33 -0500
Bob, All I can say is: AMEN ! 73 de Phil - N8PS -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00400.html (14,345 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:55:51 -0500
Old thread, I know, but eQSL came up at the VE session the other night and I got to thinking that when I work all 40 CQ Zones, I'll probably sign up, since eQSL is now accepted for the WAZ awards. Lo
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00029.html (8,035 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 23:38:23 -0600
Think of them as unsolicited QSLs. You still have to confirm them yourself, either by uploading your log, or by manually confirming them. LoTW system is much better, IMHO. 73 - Jim AD1C
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00032.html (8,688 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:27:05 -0500
That they can be sent is disturbing. You could do that with paper cards, too, of course, but a system can be designed to prevent this type of thing. No kidding! And designed just so. If I were to sig
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00034.html (8,323 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:38:21 -0400
Yes, of course you can reject eQSL confirmations. Where you saw them listed is a red X or green checkmark. I only see those if there's no match on a QSO I uploaded from my logging program. A mismatch
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00035.html (9,750 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: Christopher Burke <chris@n9yh.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:08:03 -0500
Yeah, you can return eQSLs NIL no worries. There are a whole bunch of reasons you can give for rejecting an eQSL, plus a "fill in the blank" option. But before you kibosh eQSL entirely, think about j
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00036.html (11,188 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: "Kostas Stamatis" <sv1dpi@otenet.gr>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 23:16:55 +0300
just a comment abt uploading to LotW I think that it is very easy. I just do a right click on the file which i want to upload and send it to lotw-logs@arrl.org The more difficult is that you must con
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00037.html (12,911 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:20:01 -0500
Seriously? Did I misread what you wrote? I need to give eQSL total access to my LoTW account to get "verified"? Not this ham. Actually, signing your logs proves that you were the one that uploaded th
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00038.html (8,446 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] CQ to accept EQSL for awards (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:37:06 -0400
Peter, How about taking a deep breathe. I don't think anything about LoTW or eQSL is worth getting very excited over. First, you don't really need to do anything and you can still use eQSL. It's like
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00039.html (9,419 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu