Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Bit\s+length\s+errors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Bit\s+length\s+errors\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Bit length errors (score: 1): Author: "Mike Mellinger WA0SXV" <wa0sxv@mellinger.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:52:17 -0700; Changed name to ask a question of W7AY: To what extent does this same problem exists in the traditional serial port? Is this just a problem of implementation of the particular interface? 73, Mike WA0; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00380.html (8,305 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Bit length errors (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:58:59 -0800; Back when men were men and UARTs were UARTs (remember the National 16550?), you can get quite close to the 45.45 baud value. The baud rate of the 16550 is defined by 115200/factor. So, with a factor; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00381.html (10,484 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]