Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+BARTG\s+COMMENTS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+BARTG\s+COMMENTS\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:10:34 -0600; I had some fun in the BARTG SPRINT> Worked 186 Q's and a score of 49,104 points. There were two posts about the BARTG exchange that I disagree with. Both operators stated all they need from a call wa; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00708.html (8,244 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "jim" <wb5aaa@windstream.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:16:18 -0600; I think u are 100% correct with these very short exchanges. Collecting more taxes than is absolutely necessary is legalized robbery. "Calvin Coolidge" 30th Pres of U.S.A(1923-1929) from the shack of; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00709.html (8,700 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "Martin Bluhm" <marty@w8aks.us>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:01:45 -0500; I normally don't like to get drawn into this type of discussions; but going to make an exception on this thread. I have to agree with both Dick and Jim on this one. With the congestion on the bands,; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00710.html (10,861 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "jim" <wb5aaa@windstream.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:06:00 -0600; AMEN Collecting more taxes than is absolutely necessary is legalized robbery. "Calvin Coolidge" 30th Pres of U.S.A(1923-1929) from the shack of WB5AAA 73 de JIM I normally don't like to get drawn int; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00711.html (11,437 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: Fabi va2up <va2up@live.ca>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:26:35 -0500; Hi guys, I would like to comment on this since I'm one of the 'short' S&P exchange macro. I started using the 'no callsign exchange' a couple of montyhs back but still feel uncomfortable at times. Th; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00712.html (12,158 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:46:50 -0800 (PST); I have also noticed that several operators were in too big of a hurry. As a consequence, they need to be aware that they are missing out on confirmed QSOs. Crowded and/or degraded band conditions, as; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00713.html (11,047 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:03:03 -0800; The problem has become worse over the years. What I ended up doing in the Roundup when a station sends an exchange without my call sign in it: I keep silent until they send a repeat exchange that is; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00714.html (8,320 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "k0bx@arrl.net" <k0bx@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:03:47 -0800 (PST); I did not have the short report problem. Mine was the long reports which was OK but several gave me 599 or 5nn indicating that they did not read the rules before the contest. It is not a complaint. I; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00715.html (8,200 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:19:15 -0800; Hi Marty Have to agree with yo on this one. I don't know how many times I've called a station and got LFK454JJL5KJ 599 03. I had no idea who he was working. If 'W7WHY' was on the end, I'd know. Of co; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00716.html (11,909 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:45:59 -0900; I too had several stations send me NR only without a call. They did not make it into my log and probably missed the AK mult! Please remember in your quest to keep your macro short you may not make in; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00717.html (9,859 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:48:37 -0800; Interesting I have tried all sorts of reports over the years and this year operated at K7OX's for Roundup. He had his set up W7WHY 599 WA WA I don't recall more than a couple of times during the enti; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00718.html (14,535 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:53:43 -0500; Gary AL9A wrote: "I too had several stations send me NR only without a call. They did not make it into my log and probably missed the AK mult!" If you were calling CQ, and I called you, you would inc; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00721.html (9,765 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:50:02 -0900; Put away the multilayer flame suit Shelby - I have a very small torch! :) Example: I'm running and I get a call from W4KK to which I respond "W4KK NNN NNN W4KK". The first send of your call is to ack; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00722.html (12,968 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:46:09 -0600; Interesting thread but I have to disagree. There's absolutely nothing wrong with sending only the serial number in the BARTG RTTY Sprint when S&P AND you see your callsign correctly when the run stat; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00724.html (12,069 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:12:05 -0600; I guess like other shortcuts, you pays your money and takes your chances. If you are willing to take the chance that you will be printed & accepted, go for it. I logged a few, but I didn't log a few; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00725.html (13,475 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:18:16 -0800; Good points have been made on both sides of this thread, but what is missing for me is the reality that each QSO is a unique situation. There is not "correct" way of handling every contact. "It depen; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00726.html (10,264 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 22:02:00 -0600; Your capability to push out a strong signal should be a factor in this discussion... If you are in S&P, using a G5RV at 20' and 100W on 80m, then it will probably pay strong returns to use a longer r; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00727.html (13,454 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: NQ4S - Delbert <NQ4S@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:46:30 -0500; Bingo! I'm running 100W into an attic loop and only do S&P which causes me to use what is probably an overly long report macro. I have a 2xCALL and 3xCALL macro for calling and my main report macro i; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00728.html (11,261 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: "John Barber GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:48:50 -0800; Don has it right with his comments about the Sprint being a pure rate contest, which is the reason for the number only exchange. What you send has to depend on the balance between getting the data ac; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00730.html (9,872 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: NQ4S - Delbert <NQ4S@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:19:14 -0500; Considering that I only had a spare hour to work BARTG it's no wonder I didn't find you. Thanks for the tips. I'm thinking of trying to run during CQ WPX RTTY next month. My prefix should be fairly p; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00731.html (11,081 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]