Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+BARTG\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+BARTG\s*$/: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

21. [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Torben Kahr <oz9ga@kahrius.dk>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:09:53 +0100; Hello Actually, I have only antennas for 40 and 80 meters. Can I take part in the BARTG contest in both classes at the same time, i.e. class SS80 and SS40, with the same log? 73 de OZ9GA (5P9X) Torbe; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00080.html (6,297 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:04:27 -0700 (PDT); Torben, you've raised a good question. Normally contest sponsors will not allow an operator to enter to more than one class. I wanted to do this in CQ WPX RTTY but the rules for that contest specfici; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00082.html (8,496 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:23:53 -0400; Not to put too fine a point on it, but he did say "take part in", not enter. I can't think of a contest that I've entered that did not allow SO1B operators to operate as much as they like on any band; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00083.html (9,409 bytes)
24. [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Dave Greig <daven3buo@att.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:41:07 -0500; If I get on and operate as N3BUO (not N3BUO/5) and do not turn my log in will everyone I work receive credit? Thank You! Dave Greig N3BUO Phone: (682) 422-6667 Twitter: @N3BUO Facebook: https://www.f; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00084.html (7,063 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: John Hensley <w5jv@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:01:24 -0500; I think I have an original BARTG unit with notes on it if anyone is interested. Just QSL via private email. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http:; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00085.html (7,384 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Keith Maton <g6nhu@me.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:10:01 +0000 (UTC); I can. The EA PSK63 contest just last weekend! I made QSOs on both 15m and 20m and submitted a single band entry. It was rejected back to me with the rules quoted: "If a participant works more than o; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00086.html (10,465 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM <wb2rhm@wb2rhm.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:15:34 -0400; Dave, Please, just send in the log as a CHECKLOG, then everyone who works you on any band will get what they deserve. 73, Ben - WB2RHM/4 At 11:41 03/15/2013, you wrote: From: Dave Greig <daven3buo@at; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00087.html (8,524 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:33:59 -0500; It's not a good question! The rules are on the BARTG website and clearly state: 'No station may enter more than one class.' Torben contacted BARTG and I have let him know the answer. The other questi; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00088.html (10,561 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:37:38 -0500; -- Original Message -- From: "Al Kozakiewicz" <akozak@hourglass.com> To: "Don AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; "RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com> Cc: <arthur.bard@btinternet.com> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00089.html (8,871 bytes)
30. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:34:31 -0700 (PDT); Darn, I read those rules three times and didn't see it! It's there... "No station may enter more than one class." Time for new glass... 73, Don AA5AU _______________________________________________ R; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00093.html (11,567 bytes)
31. [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: "Bato, Andras" <bato@starjan.hu>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:41:15 +0000; BARTG rules are too complicated! Congratulations to the brain trust who invented to send time! UcxLog went crazy as well... Change your rules BARTG -in case there is an organization behind this name!; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00095.html (7,724 bytes)
32. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 09:51:30 -0700; Seeing how long the BARTG organization and the BARTG contest has existed (check your ancient issues of Radcom), this surely must be tongue in cheek? 73 Chen, W7AY ____________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00096.html (7,703 bytes)
33. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:51:11 -0700; Back in the 60's I used to send the time, manually, on a Model 15. Try that for a few hours :-) 73 Tom W7WHY Seeing how long the BARTG organization and the BARTG contest has existed (check your ancie; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00097.html (8,570 bytes)
34. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 20:52:14 -0500; Contest rules as lid filter. Interesting concept! Bravo BARTG! -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contes; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00098.html (7,753 bytes)
35. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 19:45:33 -0800; Apparently they don't filter out all the lids. The rules say the GMT time is a "...full four figure GMT time..." So why are some lids sending "HH:MM:SS"? The colons don't add anything to the clarity; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00099.html (9,336 bytes)
36. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:47:25 -0400; You forgot the addition of the completely superfluous "Z"! Al AB2ZY Apparently they don't filter out all the lids. The rules say the GMT time is a "...full four figure GMT time..." So why are some li; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00100.html (9,637 bytes)
37. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:39:52 -0500; I saw someone sending "UTC" between the serial number and the time. That was unexpected and confusing, to say the least! He must have got yelled at because when I heard him a couple hours later, the; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00101.html (11,061 bytes)
38. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Ron Brown <bctech58@shaw.ca>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:02:04 -0700; Probably have the wrong BART contest loaded 73 Ron. VA7Hz _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00102.html (9,845 bytes)
39. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: "G. E. Janssens - K5WW" <k5ww@live.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 01:55:29 -0500; Maybe the OP was just looking for a "contester for hire"? Tongue in cheek fellas, of course! Erik - K5WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://l; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00103.html (8,656 bytes)
40. Re: [RTTY] BARTG (score: 1): Author: Keith Maton <g6nhu@me.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 07:30:49 +0000; I've had two people send me their local time and one person sent me 1142 at 1756 last night! I'm doing a 15m entry but a CME hit us at 06:01 this morning and I've had one QSO since then. It's now 07:; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00104.html (10,731 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]