Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Another\s+\"macro\"\s+suggestion\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Another\s+\"macro\"\s+suggestion\.\.\.\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Another "macro" suggestion... (score: 1): Author: Ray Day <rayday@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:14:35 -0800; ..... to help us "Search and Pouncers"....(and for the true afficionados of the RTTY game) How about the CQ-ing station on the QSL/QRZ transmission of the exchange send, rather than "N6HE QSL W1XXX C; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00250.html (8,208 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Another "macro" suggestion... (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:50:17 -0500; I agree but with a twist. I have it xxxxx TU K2DSL CQ That way there should be no confusion on who was logged and if you tune the dial on TU and what was sent TU W6WRT K2DSL CQ, you just got yourself; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00252.html (9,780 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Another "macro" suggestion... (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:50:23 -0500 (EST); This is a good point. I can't see any immediate drawbacks, so I'll change my running macros for the WPX RTTY. Not that I run much, but I try. If I can get 10% of my QSOs running, I consider it a real; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00253.html (7,464 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Another "macro" suggestion... (score: 1): Author: "Anthony J. Cioffi $N2KI$" <n2ki@amsat.org>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:24:23 -0500; I agree with Dave's point and do the same on the TU; VFO is on the move to the next contact. However, I did use QRZ at the end of my TU macro. In the 1080 contacts I made, there was not one iota of c; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00254.html (11,289 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Another "macro" suggestion... (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:37:44 -0500; QRZ at the end has been used by DXers, DXpeditions, and contesters for years. Now all of sudden we are concerned with what it means and saving one character? QRM, QSB, etc probably account for more t; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00265.html (13,443 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Another "macro" suggestion... (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:18:00 -0500; Good idea, Ray. Let him know up front. I will change my macros. I had been sending "w1abc qsl tu ..." and never gave it a thought. I think your method is better. Jerry W4UK __________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00273.html (8,777 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Another "macro" suggestion... (score: 1): Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:11:09 -0500; Ray, A good point, indeed. For this very purpose my usual macro is: TU N6HE 73 DE VE3IAE QRZ or TU N6HE 73<CR> DE VE3IAE QRZ. "73" is yet another confirmation if you eventually miss the TU in sometim; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00279.html (10,217 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Another "macro" suggestion... (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:18:48 -0600; Vladimir... Actually there are 4 "confirmations" in your reply examples... TU, 73, VE3IAE, and QRZ. IMO, the 73 is not needed at all. If you did not receive my report, there would be neither a TU (wh; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00307.html (12,213 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Another "macro" suggestion... (score: 1): Author: Gedking@aol.com; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:31:44 EST; I thought Ham Radio and contesting was supposed to be fun. I never there were so many win at all costs Malcontents in Ham Radio That Grumpy old Fart _______________________________________________ RT; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00311.html (8,175 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Another "macro" suggestion... (score: 1): Author: "Schmidt-Eutingen" <joheschmidt@gmx.de>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:50:20 +0100; Me too, but obviously we are dino's 73 Heinz DK7UM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00329.html (8,882 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Another "macro" suggestion... (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:13:44 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Excellent point. I have done it the "wrong" way for 17 years and more than 57,000 RTTY contest QSOs but I am going to change to your recommendation. Never too old to learn. :; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00353.html (9,732 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]