- 1. [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes (score: 1)
- Author: Mark <n2qt.va@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:46:14 -0400
- In the minutes just published is: THEREFORE the ARRL Board of Directors directs staff to prepare and submit a petition to the FCC requesting the following rule changes: Create a 10 kHz Technician Dig
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00130.html (6,940 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 21:34:24 -0400
- It's another poorly thought out idea from ARRL - this time from the Southeastern Division Director. Technicians already have privileges in the normal "digital" frequencies but are restricted to CW a
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00131.html (8,599 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:14:30 -0500
- I was going to be upset at the nibbling away of the phone portion of 80 and then remembered (eventually, but before sending this), that until very recently, the phone portion started at 3700. But why
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00132.html (7,992 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:05:01 -0500
- It has been pointed out to me (privately) that this is simply to allow more sail mail without having to take *2* 35-question multiple choice tests. Sailors interested in communications on a regular b
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00133.html (7,596 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas W4HM" <thomasfgiella@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:42:42 -0400
- The ARRL operates much like government entities at city, state and federal levels. Two words, arrogance and incompetence and it's why I' no longer a member of the organization. I left after their RM
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00137.html (8,080 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu