Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\s+160\s+Band\s+Plan\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\s+160\s+Band\s+Plan\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] ARRL 160 Band Plan (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <flcyclone@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 18:16:56 -0500; Joe you are part of the very small group of 1 x 2 callsign hams with gigantic runaway egos that insist that they are omniscient by virtue of their license class, ARRL DXCC entity totals and electrica; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00038.html (16,334 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] ARRL 160 Band Plan (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <W4TV@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:17:22 -0500; Tom, You are typical of the class of self serving jerks who hasn't bothered to learn what amateur radio is about, its history, or even enough about the technology to understand when you are wrong. Yo; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00040.html (21,720 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] ARRL 160 Band Plan (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 03:17:12 +0000; You are typical of the class of self serving jerks who hasn't bothered to learn what amateur radio is about, its history, or even enough about the technology to understand when you are wrong. You don; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00044.html (7,732 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]