Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\.org\s+Vote\s+\-\s+We\s+Need\s+to\s+Become\s+More\s+Pro\-active\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\.org\s+Vote\s+\-\s+We\s+Need\s+to\s+Become\s+More\s+Pro\-active\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote - We Need to Become More Pro-active (score: 1): Author: Arsk0jn@aol.com (Arsk0jn@aol.com); Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:57:58 EDT; Maybe this isn't shared my the majority on this site but I was disappointed that RTTY only got 1/5 (19.9%) of the vote while PSK got nearly 1/3 of the vote. There are many times when I tune across th; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00372.html (8,200 bytes)
2. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote - We Need to Become More Pro-active (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 10:51:53 -0500; I wasn't so much disappointed as I was surprised by the popularity of PSK31 as shown on the ARRL poll. It's hard to say how accurate the poll was, but I believe it may be accurate enough to show us t; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00375.html (11,061 bytes)
3. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote - We Need to Become More Pro-active (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:12:19 -0700; _________________________________________________________ Don's comments are right on, as usual. I would love to experiment with PSK31 in a high power, narrow bandwidth configuration, but to do that; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00377.html (8,313 bytes)
4. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote - We Need to Become More Pro-active (score: 1): Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen); Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 10:57:16 -0700; I don't think you have to run a kilowatt. You just need to be 3 dB above the other guys. Considering most of them run a dipole, Bill just needs to use 10 watts to be loud. Hee hee. I often run 80 wat; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00378.html (10,324 bytes)
5. [RTTY] ARRL.org Vote - We Need to Become More Pro-active (score: 1): Author: Robert W. Schafer" <robert.schafer@wcom.com (Robert W. Schafer); Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 12:58:26 -0500; Please note that if you do any comparisons - there are two methods for = PSK31, BPSK and QPSK. While nearly all software supports both, 99.9% of = all QSOs on the air now will be in BPSK, which does; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00379.html (9,741 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]