Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+A\s+question\s+on\s+the\s+history\s+of\s+the\s+major\s+RTTY\s+contests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+A\s+question\s+on\s+the\s+history\s+of\s+the\s+major\s+RTTY\s+contests\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] A question on the history of the major RTTY contests (score: 1): Author: Rudy Bakalov via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:22:09 +0000 (UTC); In the past week or so I had two separate situations in which I got the distict impression that CQ WPX RTTY and CQ WW RTTY are considered "separate" events from their respective CW/SSB brothers. So I; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00055.html (7,778 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] A question on the history of the major RTTY contests (score: 1): Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:42:06 -0700; Yes, there is a historical reason. The RTTY modes were instigated by different people. Also, in those days RTTY was not perceived as a sibling to CW and SSB, but rather a different species. Now, t; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00056.html (7,826 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]