- 1. [RTTY] 30M Band Plan Question (score: 1)
- Author: "John, K9EL" <k9el@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:58:30 -0500
- During my last operation as FS/K9EL, I was chastised because I was operating RTTY on 10138, listening up 1-3. I did a Google search for 30m Band Plans and found quite a few conflicting plans. Our gro
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00367.html (7,090 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] 30M Band Plan Question (score: 1)
- Author: Thom <ki8w@ki8w.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 02:04:52 +0000
- Yep there are some confusing plans out there. I as taught to use 10.140 and above for data transmissions. That area is where I have been conducting m on-air tests. 73 Thom KI8W During my last operati
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00368.html (7,707 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] 30M Band Plan Question (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 23:21:57 -0500
- Most of the RTTY DX I've worked on 30m has been above 10.140. Quite a few park on the high end and split down also some countries only allow digi above 10.140. When I ran as W1AW/0 I was on 10.130 sp
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00372.html (8,040 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] 30M Band Plan Question (score: 1)
- Author: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:03:59 +0100
- I looked at this before going to GD, as 30M was going to be a mainstay band in current conditions. 10130-10150 is recommended for digital modes by the IARU in all regions. The area round 10140 is ful
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00375.html (8,442 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] 30M Band Plan Question (score: 1)
- Author: Larry <lknain@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:03:18 -0400
- I pointed out to John that the JT65 folks use 10138 which will obviously extend up a bit by maybe 1.5KHz. Most of the RTTY I have heard is 10140 or above although I have heard some down as far as 101
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-10/msg00379.html (9,750 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu