Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+30\s+meter\s+rtty\s+restrictions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+30\s+meter\s+rtty\s+restrictions\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] 30 meter rtty restrictions (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:51:05 -0600; Would the hams in countries that restrict 30 meter digital operations to above 10140 please advise me of online allocations so I can convince someone that his beacon is right on top of the 10140-1014; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00037.html (6,746 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] 30 meter rtty restrictions (score: 1): Author: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:49:22 -0600; Bill, here's what I would do: e-mail the PropNet guru whose messages you forwarded to me (thank you) and send him the following message (feel free to copy and paste): "Dear Sir: Part 97.3(a)(9) defin; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00039.html (8,701 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] 30 meter rtty restrictions (score: 1): Author: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:27:30 -0600; Not sure what you mean "The dumb ARRL approved it."... I didn't see anything in that article that referenced PropNet, and the ARRL can't overrule the FCC rules. The article is basically just a "yeah,; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00040.html (9,953 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]