Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+160M\s+RTTY\s+frequency\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+160M\s+RTTY\s+frequency\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] 160M RTTY frequency? (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 21:20:50 -0600; What's the 160M RTTY frequency? I forgot. Might try down there since this band is valid for this test. Thanks 73, Don AA5AU http://www.aa5au.com; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00034.html (6,457 bytes)
2. [RTTY] 160M RTTY frequency? (score: 1): Author: ekki@plicht.de (Ekki Plicht); Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 05:14:06 +0100; In IARU Region 1 it's 1838 to 1842. 73, Ekki, DF4OR; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00035.html (6,530 bytes)
3. [RTTY] 160M RTTY frequency? (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 21:07:53 -0800; _________________________________________________________ That would be pretty unpopular in Region 2. I'd recommend around 1805 +/- here. Split, maybe? 73, Bill W7TI; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00037.html (6,879 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]