Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+160\s+contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+160\s+contest\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] 160 contest (score: 1): Author: Jay <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 07:35:26 -0800; This thread seems to be fun. It started with adding 160 to CQWW RTTY and WPX RTTY, both of which are bad ideas IMHO. Having created a couple of contests doing a RTTY one is a good idea. Now all you s; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00007.html (7,366 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] 160 contest (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:16:07 -0800; So, other than it would be harder to decode, what is the real reason not to use RTTY in the WPX? Bigger antennas that are hard to put up? On 40 I'd like to have a stack of 3 4 element yagis, but I ha; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00015.html (7,526 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]