Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+\[MMTTY\]\s+Fwd\:\s+ARLB006\s+NTIA\:\s+No\s+Objection\s+to\s+Additional\s+Data\s+Modes\s+on\s+60\s+Meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+\[MMTTY\]\s+Fwd\:\s+ARLB006\s+NTIA\:\s+No\s+Objection\s+to\s+Additional\s+Data\s+Modes\s+on\s+60\s+Meters\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] [MMTTY] Fwd: ARLB006 NTIA: No Objection to Additional Data Modes on 60 Meters (score: 1): Author: Kai Siwiak <k.siwiak@ieee.org>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:10:51 -0400; Hi Joe, Looks like ARRL are incrementally seeing the light. I've included my recommendation for how we can send the 170 Hz shift / 45.45 baud RTTY we all know and love, and adhere to the FCC/NTIA req; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00165.html (14,241 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] [MMTTY] Fwd: ARLB006 NTIA: No Objection to Additional Data Modes on 60 Meters (score: 1): Author: Kai Siwiak <k.siwiak@ieee.org>; Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:16:59 -0400; In my previous post (below) I omitted a comma in the tone frequency list. The corrected line is: [ComboList] Mark=2125,2000,1700,1445,1415,1275,1170,1000,915,660 73 Kai, KE4PT _______________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00166.html (15,371 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] [MMTTY] Fwd: ARLB006 NTIA: No Objection to Additional Data Modes on 60 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:25:36 -0800; If I may, let me add on more thing to the MMTTY setup for 60M if you're currently running FSK. (5) In MMTTY on the Misc tab change from COM-TxD(FSK) to Sound. 73, Gary AL9A -- Original Message -- Fro; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-03/msg00210.html (13,473 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]