Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+NA\s+Sprint\s+RTTY\s+Log\s+Check\s+Report\s+Analysis\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint RTTY Log Check Report Analysis (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:45:58 -0400
ed@w0yk.com wrote: "K0YR did not submit a log, so log checking used the QSOs from the received logs to determine his sent exchange." Even thought I don't have a dog in this fight, since when is it co
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00120.html (9,467 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint RTTY Log Check Report Analysis (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:59:05 -0400
I'm pretty sure, though I'm not home to check, using N1MM if I hard coded T0m into the exchange macros but used TOM when setting up the contest, I'd be sending T0m (with a zero) to everyone but my ge
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00121.html (11,569 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint RTTY Log Check Report Analysis (score: 1)
Author: Iain MacDonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:08:02 +0000
Yes, that's right. Yes. It would be nice to have separate symbols for name, section, etc, so we could share generic macro definitions, but it doesn't work that way. In any case, K0YR didn't turn in a
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00122.html (12,248 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] NA Sprint RTTY Log Check Report Analysis (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:31:57 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Use the macro buttons in the Digital Interface window. You can enter the full exchange or any part you want. In a contest with a two part exchange, I put one part on one butt
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00123.html (9,733 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu