Forwarded from the ARRL: 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
Just FYI, the 75m phone crowd seems to be off to an early start in opposing the RM. -- Michael Adams | N1EN | mda@n1en.org Forwarded from the ARRL: 73, Bill W6WRT ____________________________________
I finally looked at this. I would support this if it did not include digital privileges for Technicians (and the 27 remaining Novices). If that single portion -- absent from ARRL's bulletin -- were r
Peter, not sure if you are being sarcastic, but there are 12,891 current Novice license holders in the U.S. That represents approximately 2% of the nearly 800,000 total U.S. license holders. Whether
You've missed the point completely. There is no justification for giving Technicians (or the 12,891 remaining Novices) Data privileges on 80 m or anywhere else (they already have it on every band 10
It seems rather petty and counterproductive to deny any license class access to any mode authorized to other license classes in the same spectrum. That said, I would certainly limit Novices and Tech
You're right. Open all the bands and all the modes. Can we at least give them a hard test first? Clearly, none of you have read through the question and answer pools since you last took a test. If we
No, Peter, I get your point. I was fact-checking your statements just like you fact-checked someone else's claim that Technician class licensees couldn't be trustees of repeaters. There those who bel