Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wx4tm@tm-moore.com: 67 ]

Total 67 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] Exchange of Signal Reports (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:54:14 -0600
Yes, of course you're absolutely correct. Everyone would probably agree. However, getting the ARRL, CQ or other big contest sponsor to even begin to consider such a sensible change is like pulling el
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00327.html (8,321 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] Re: Contest Happenings?? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:11:17 -0600
Not sure how this little habit/feature ever got started except that it may have been as a result of some programmer getting a lot QSL cards with incorrect times. As a result, he decided to send the c
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00331.html (12,559 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] Contest Happenings - Comments! (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:04:12 -0600
welllll, guess we could always bring up the ole volatile SO2R vs SO1R issue!! my favorite.. another dead horse? Tom WX4TM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-01/msg00353.html (8,112 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] Team SO1R (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:03:00 -0600
c'mon guys, its 'no contest' everyone knows a good 'typical' so2r will beat a good typical so1r by at least 1/4 more points.. any ole time.. besides they just 'have to' beat the so1r guys.. just imag
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00380.html (8,162 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] anarts weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:26:32 -0500
hey.. just a few thunderstorms??? we gotta tropical storm (cud be a hurricane by tomorrow) boring down on us.. high winds, tornadoes, severe thunderstorms and flash flooding.. nooooo sweat, right?? h
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-06/msg00080.html (7,636 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] WAEDC! (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 04:09:18 -0500
in principle I somewhat agree, Bill.. However, I think the adrenlin surges a tad with the challenge to accurately copy and send the max nr of mesgs.. in a way, sorta like maintaining that '80' or '90
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00277.html (8,454 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] RTTY gear available (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:53:20 -0600
WHAT??? a HAM with TOO MUCH stuff!!! IMPOSSIBLE!! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00055.html (7,136 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:32:11 -0600
is it not true that in the arrlru, SO's are not restricted to running two or more radios and, in fact, can actually transmit any of them simultaneously on separate or even the same band?? IF not, ple
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00157.html (10,056 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:29:44 -0600
-- Original Message -- From: "Bill Coleman" <aa4lr@arrl.net> To: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com> Cc: "Andrei Nevis" <v49a@yahoo.com>; <morris_karen@bellsouth.net>; "Richard Ferch" <ve3iay@rac.ca>; <
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00162.html (10,228 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:47:15 -0600
The FACT remains. Take two equally good operators and like stations, one running SO1R the other SO2R and the SO2R will win every time. The only difference is the 2nd radio. Not only will the SO2R win
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00165.html (11,520 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] - "Freely available software" (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:48:27 -0600
Hey we could always revisit the SO2R vs SO1R issue for a while.. that seems to raise a few blood pressures a bit and make for controversial reading!! Tom WX4TM _______________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00413.html (8,866 bytes)

32. [RTTY] QSL'ing (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 06:22:50 -0600
Hey folks, we need to remind new hams, especially new RTTY'ers of the coutesy and tradition of QSL'ing. In the last two weeks, I've received a dozen or so QSL's in the mail direct from apparently new
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00555.html (7,252 bytes)

33. [RTTY] BARTG SPRINT WX4TM (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 06:43:21 -0600
(submission form N/A on 3830 yet) OP: WX4TM CLASS: SOE (SINGLE RADIO, SINGLE OP) HRS: 15 CLAIMED SCORE: 366,720 CLUB: SECC SUMMARY BND QSO DX CA 80M 110 1 0 40M 222 9 14 20M 408 44 7 15M 24 5 0 10M 0
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00646.html (7,107 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP Sprint SOABLP (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:02:43 -0600
yes, it seemed pretty clear that MANY people didn't read the rules, huh? lots and lots of 599's. Maybe their software 'required' it?? And yes, saw lots and lots of 2 and 3 line responses. But it coul
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00653.html (12,095 bytes)

35. Re: [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:33:04 -0600
Well John, you were about as nice as you could possibly be in your reply comments. However his attitude and comments really didn't deserve your time and patience. A gentleman you are. I'd like to bel
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00725.html (8,646 bytes)

36. [RTTY] COME NOW... SO1R SHALL RIIISE AGAIN! (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:34:47 -0600
Hi Tom. I'm sure you have, or will, see this post, from ZC4LI? Now might be a good time for the "proclamation"? :)) C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW -- Nice to see that the organisers of the Mexico RTTY Contests
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00038.html (9,413 bytes)

37. Re: [RTTY] Dayton (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 12:18:40 -0600
Mary (WX4MM) and I will be going.. Tom WX4TM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00273.html (6,838 bytes)

38. [RTTY] WX4TM NAQP SOABLP (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:46:27 -0600
NAQP FEB 2006 WX4TM/TOM AL Time: 9:45 hrs SCORE 85,800 BND QSO MUL 80M 148 43 40M 151 43 20M 264 58 15M 9 6 10M 0 0 TOTAL 572 150 Many tks to all for the Q's. Exceptional good runs on 20, 40 and 80M
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00353.html (8,131 bytes)

39. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY SO1R Team Score (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:48:08 -0600
_______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00387.html (11,447 bytes)

40. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 12:06:10 -0500
NAQP JUL 2006 CALL: WX4TM NAME: TOM QTH: AL CLASS: SOABLP OP TIME: 5.5 HRS SUMMARY: 80M 80 33 40M 134 39 20M 132 39 15M 0 0 10M 0 0 TOTAL 346 111 SCORE: 38,406 SOAPBOX Mercy sakes alive! Is the moon
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00098.html (8,324 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu