Mail Archive Search: <+from:ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:ws7ik7tj@gmail.com: 221 ]

Total 221 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY AFC Bug (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:01:13 -0800; Sure use a SCOPE. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00282.html (10,164 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:04:24 -0800; Fabi is spot on as usual. Its not the the waiting station, its for the tuning station. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00283.html (11,266 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:13:45 -0800; Bingo, Hank. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00285.html (9,631 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] Why send 599 report (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 09:04:10 -0800; We could just send these maco's as a Phone Application on your Iphone or your Droid. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00528.html (10,062 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] 2011 RTTY Roundup - 3830 Claimed Scores 14Jan2011 (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 13:10:45 -0800; Because Single Operators can use 2 radios and unlimited band changes. So really SO2R stations can have much higher scores. Multi's generally use 1 radio as back and forth to pickup 3 mults per hour o; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00544.html (41,315 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:36:33 -0800; Or both _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00596.html (8,739 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] AA6YQ FIR512 download & instructions (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:05:45 -0800; [Define2] Name=AA6YQ-FIR-512 Enabled=1 AFC=0 AFCFixShift=1 AFCSQ=32 AFCTime=8.000000e+00 AFCSweep=1.000000e+00 UOS=1 TxNet=0 TxDisRev=0 LimitDxGain=2.000000e+02 LimitOverSampling=0 LimitAGC=1 ATC=0 A; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00601.html (8,583 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] DOS computer for improved RTTY reception? (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:52:30 -0800; Lots of them out there. Google for Spectran V2 one that I use. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00668.html (9,209 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:48:37 -0800; Interesting I have tried all sorts of reports over the years and this year operated at K7OX's for Roundup. He had his set up W7WHY 599 WA WA I don't recall more than a couple of times during the enti; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00718.html (14,535 bytes)
30. [RTTY] Roundup (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:53:30 -0800; Stories, anadotes, and of course the quest for pictures. Once again I am doing the QST and web writeups for the ARRL RTTY Roundup and need as much material as I can get. Sure would enjoy in particula; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00719.html (6,905 bytes)
31. [RTTY] exchange (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:32:12 -0800; When I answered this thread I didn't really read it right. I assumed that it was by Runner to answer station. Where it was really after everyone knew both sides of the callsign structure. Just the ex; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00729.html (6,785 bytes)
32. [RTTY] Roundup Log (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:29:50 -0800; Log Submission date: From the ARRL Website All entries are must be postmarked or e-mailed by 2359 UTC Tuesday, February 8, 2011. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00743.html (6,234 bytes)
33. [RTTY] Roundup Logs (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:45:21 -0800; All entries are must be postmarked or e-mailed by 2359 UTC Tuesday, February 8, 2011. That's a week from today. Still looking for some reports from Japan, Europe, East Coast for my writeup. No one se; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00001.html (6,419 bytes)
34. Re: [RTTY] Fwd: [GreenKeys] lack of civility (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:47:51 -0800; Cut me a break. This isn't that tough, guys. "Just give me a darn number" "wpx test serial nr start 001" Same exact amount of characters. This is not in the tradition of RTTY nor RTTY contesting, ju; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00082.html (8,990 bytes)
35. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:01:37 -0800; Heh that's all just too funny. I send 2 spaces and a Carriage Return, Ya'll can do it how ever you want. Really has no significance at all. If I don't copy it I ask for a repeat. All of these buffer; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00176.html (10,604 bytes)
36. Re: [RTTY] K or carriage return (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:25:59 -0800; Well I will take a stab at this. Lots of difference of opinion. I was running in this contest low power 100 watts to a butternut, so antenna is less than optimum. My exchange is for example. CR N5UWY; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00179.html (12,174 bytes)
37. Re: [RTTY] What should I expect from 3db improvement in SNR? (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:12:56 -0800; Its not nearly as much the 3 db having much of a SNR improvement which Chen has noted, but the major difference is in "presence" on the band which you can't really quantify. In fact I find with 150 w; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00258.html (10,289 bytes)
38. Re: [RTTY] What should I expect from 3db improvement in SNR? (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:19:51 -0800; All I can echo here is that you need AIR, AIR, in the RF Deck in places they don't ever think about. Like the solder melting out of a Henry tuning section. (Fixed that with more FANS. Most Amp's even; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-02/msg00259.html (9,961 bytes)
39. Re: [RTTY] Three lessons from NAQP (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:08:46 -0800; Not really, when I see WS I'm gone. Frankly all of these "micro managers" on this list are missing some key points. Accuracy as Shelby so aptly pointed out, and the receiver if they are in all that m; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00010.html (10,134 bytes)
40. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Newbie and brag files (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:34:45 -0800; Well....not exactly...used to be very predominant in the RTTY world as well before all ragchewing seems to have unfortunately moved to PSK. Brag "tapes" were used by lots of folks, most of which were; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00012.html (10,502 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]