Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ws7ik7tj@gmail.com: 221 ]

Total 221 documents matching your query.

161. [RTTY] HF Band Plan Committee (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 09:10:08 -0800
Least there appear to be some good folks on this committee. Bruce Frahm K0BJ Chair Tom Frenave K1KI Dick Norton N6AA Staff. Steve Ford WB8IMY Chuck Skolaut K0BOG See. http://www.arrl.org/files/file/A
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00373.html (6,687 bytes)

162. Re: [RTTY] Arrl requests digital mode comments (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:29:10 -0800
Others are already active. http://hflink.com/bandplans/iaru_region_2.html Due by 3/31. Seems like they might have asked BEFORE RM-11708. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing l
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00003.html (7,783 bytes)

163. Re: [RTTY] Authur Blave - ON4BX - a Silent Key (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:35:24 -0800
RIP, Arthur, indeed a giant in RTTY. Jay WS7I On 3/2/2014 6:12 PM, Wa3frp wrote: It is with regret that I write that Arthur Blave, ON4BX, became a Silent Key on February 11, 2014. Well known in Amate
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00016.html (8,020 bytes)

164. [RTTY] 24 Mhz (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 15:24:33 -0800
Sure a lot of folks working V21SG out of band _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00027.html (6,234 bytes)

165. Re: [RTTY] [MMTTY] The Problem with AFSK ... (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 07:43:16 -0700
The use of low tones in RTTY has always yielded even with FSK major problems which is why years ago, tones were changed from Low-Tones to the high tones. You can have the same problem with FSK using
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00068.html (10,381 bytes)

166. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Vision of the future (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:10:26 -0700
Okay, I would suggest hitting the delete key, however, why are these updates necessary? Why are these regulations outdated? Gross generalization that is not proven in any facts. There is nothing hold
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00078.html (8,174 bytes)

167. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Vision of the future (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:05:30 -0700
On 3/14/2014 11:45 AM, Kai penned his view: Today's rules do not regulate bandwidth, you can use much more than 100 kHz legally (the whole CW/data segment) as long as the symbol rate is less than 300
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00080.html (13,909 bytes)

168. Re: [RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:45:55 -0700
Plenty of room. For example. 14.000 - 14.035 CW more than enough. 14.035 - 14.050 RTTY, 14.050-14.060 PSK31, 14.061 - 14.070 500 Hz. 14.110-14.150 wideband. RTTY just needs to move way down into the
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00131.html (9,139 bytes)

169. Re: [RTTY] A RM-11708 Question (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:46:20 -0700
Open means they haven't begun to examine the comments about the ARRL's petition. Question: Is RM11708 still active? And are comments still permitted? 73 de Phil - N8PS _______________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00264.html (7,544 bytes)

170. Re: [RTTY] Lack of RTTY on 40 and 80 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:08:32 -0700
Well stated Don, and also a lot depends where you live. I have been working on my Single Band 40 totals to get a DXCC and as I work mostly RTTY I find that there is quite a lot on the long paths and
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00268.html (9,712 bytes)

171. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Executive Committee Meets March 29th, RM-11708 included in adgenda (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:34:35 -0700
These *are as you note comments on the comments, reply comments, and post-comments made to the FCC. *Not comments made by members to the ARRL band planning folks. Probably a good thing for the EB to
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00299.html (9,321 bytes)

172. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:40:43 -0700
That's fairly easy, Dave. When you are operating and a WL2K station clobbers you off a frequency you know it doesn't work. What leads you to conclude that they do work or that they actually are emplo
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00327.html (8,277 bytes)

173. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:43:01 -0700
On 3/29/2014 6:26 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote: That's because they aren't using busy frequency detectors, not because the ones they're using don't work. The busy frequency detectors incorporated in WinMor a
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00328.html (8,634 bytes)

174. Re: [RTTY] What is this auto mode that QRM's me? (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 09:28:43 -0700
Most all Pactor starts at 500 Hz and then speeds and expands up which is the problem with their crap. That is PACTOR - probably PACTOR II which is a 500 Hz wide mode. ________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00336.html (8,427 bytes)

175. Re: [RTTY] DXP38 serial commands? (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:45:34 -0700
Send it to Robert via direct. Thank you, Robert, AB1HL _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty ________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00362.html (7,142 bytes)

176. Re: [RTTY] Is it just me? (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:02:45 -0700
The RTTY forum wasn't cancelled at all. Someone failed to renew it. That has happened before and Shelby K4WW can tell you what an effort it is to make sure to get on the Dayton list every year. Dale
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00102.html (7,671 bytes)

177. Re: [RTTY] WINMORE (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 08:19:33 -0700
It actually has 2 modes and is either 500 Hz or 1600 Hz. Does not require registration other than to get rid of nag meter. The Busy Channel Detector works very well and is very useful. Winmor works w
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00291.html (9,860 bytes)

178. Re: [RTTY] SO2R RTTY in MK2R+ and MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 09:42:50 -0700
Gee with support like this I yearn to buy.....Try direct email, Joe. I hardly need to read this *BULLSHITAKWA" Specific software configurations have no place in the hardware manual - there are more t
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00380.html (8,588 bytes)

179. Re: [RTTY] SO2R RTTY in MK2R+ and MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 10:50:57 -0700
I don't care, Joe. You can and should take this to direct email as you do two things when you don't. (a) You make your customer service suspect at best (b) You ensure that some will not look favorabl
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00386.html (11,622 bytes)

180. Re: [RTTY] RTTY DXCC Startup date? (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:21:24 -0700
Sure can Don. July 1976 the ARRL announced a RTTY DXCC to be started on November 1, 1976. In July of 1984 they started endorsing as the first was only for 100 cards. And the RTTY Honor Roll on Decemb
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00425.html (7,636 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]
This search system is powered by Namazu