Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ws7ik7tj@gmail.com: 221 ]

Total 221 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [RTTY] jt-65 and jt-9 frequency usage (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 09:48:44 -0700
Guess we should stay off all of these as well. http://www.bandplans.com/index.php?band=20 There are many interests in the digital community and we should respect them all. ___________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00116.html (7,944 bytes)

142. Re: [RTTY] Frederick Electronics 1280a Manuals (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 11:46:52 -0700
Sent direct. Lots of stuff. 73 Jay Ws7i Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty _____
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00132.html (7,339 bytes)

143. Re: [RTTY] [rckskimmer] RTTY-spots spamming the DX-Cluster (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 05:30:40 -0700
Feel free to use the K7TJ DXSpider cluster it doesn't appear to have any problem with getting these. Nor does it have W3LPL spots. It was easy enough to get rid of those :-0 k7tj.ewarg.org 7300 _____
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00291.html (7,742 bytes)

144. [RTTY] Links (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:44:05 -0800
Just a couple of links that you might have missed. ARRL RTTY Roundup records through 2013 are up: VE/US at http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest%20Records/arrlrtty_records_wve_2013.txt DX at http://
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00066.html (7,172 bytes)

145. Re: [RTTY] What to do about ARRL's Baud Rate Proposal (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 06:32:04 -0800
Just a couple of comments as I hope to not get very involved in this other than comments directly to any possible RM. Only the ARRL Division Directors have the power. I might offer up some things fro
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00112.html (9,503 bytes)

146. [RTTY] Fyi (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:38:49 -0800
Body: 1600 IMPORTANT MESSAGE: Time is running out for comments supporting RM-11708 to the FCC, which would remove the symbol rate limitation from FCC rules, and allow hams to use Pactor 4 modems in t
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00070.html (8,556 bytes)

147. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708, the "other side" (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:58:41 -0800
Well, Bill, you would be wrong. Just give the Combined Fire Chiefs of Spokane County a call and see why they pay for the EWARG (Eastern WA Amateur Radio Group) lease year after year. It as because ba
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00078.html (10,964 bytes)

148. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Comments (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 12:58:04 -0800
The deadline is pretty flexible and usually comments come along plus or minus. They rarely cut folks off exactly on time. At least through close of business tomorrow, plus then reply comments. It mak
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00152.html (7,837 bytes)

149. Re: [RTTY] Why 150W LP in Roundup? (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:13:44 -0800
Actually this one is pretty easy. The ARRL went with their general rule of less than 150 watts and over 150 watts. Really makes no significant difference in any case. Most run 100 watts or less. Many
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00220.html (8,686 bytes)

150. Re: [RTTY] Roundup observation (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:29:36 -0800
"RTTY Roundup has grown from 295 logs submitted in 1989 to 1922 logs in 2013 -- a major increase in participation. The most significant increase in participation has come from the DX side. From only
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00135.html (12,552 bytes)

151. Re: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708 (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:52:47 -0800
I have no idea if Dave was or wasn't this year, Joe. But he beat *YOUR *2013 score by 42,824%. Do you actually enter contests ? Can't seem to find your call in CQWW RTTY database either; nor WW RTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00141.html (8,388 bytes)

152. Re: [RTTY] Multi-Single Roundup Rules (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 06:53:10 -0800
What is involved in lobbying the ARRL to change the rule to the one used in Sweepstakes where "Multioperator stations have no limitations on band changes"? Standard method is to talk to your Divisio
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00209.html (9,682 bytes)

153. Re: [RTTY] Multi-Single Roundup Rules (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 06:54:37 -0800
Yep, its all about the history of the octupus.....which is what caused the rule changes in both contests. ARRL and CQ have strongly rejected this suggestion. They see little issue with this "discrepa
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00210.html (7,889 bytes)

154. [RTTY] Fyi ARRL Contest Branch (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:18:12 -0800
Mike DeChristopher, N1TA, has resigned as ARRL Contest Branch Manager to pursue other opportunities. Duties of the Contest Branch shall be assumed immediately by a committee of current ARRL staffers,
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00343.html (8,087 bytes)

155. Re: [RTTY] FSK Keying on an Icom 7800 Problem (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:54:05 -0800
Easiest way to do this with either transistors or with opto's which are a much better idea is to just use a resistor substitution box. Even among radio's of the same brand what is required for pull u
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00005.html (7,669 bytes)

156. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:24:05 -0800
Sort of reminds me of a guy in Iceland as I recall from days gone past. He would CQ and then listen for about 5-10 minutes on his frequency and then work 20 stations or so without pause. Worked fine.
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00071.html (11,397 bytes)

157. [RTTY] DXing (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 09:27:54 -0800
Absolutely unbelievable. RTTY has now regressed into a operation of lids. I am on 24 mHz and set up about nearly a kHz above the D2 who was working simplex. Asked if the frequency was in use, and it
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00153.html (7,371 bytes)

158. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:24:44 -0800
That is a bunch of malarkey, they just don't want the phone operators in opposition. * Shouldnt 2.8 kilohertz bandwidth data emissions be restricted to the band segments where phone and image communi
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00333.html (8,914 bytes)

159. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:28:34 -0800
Their petition was for rule changes "to permit greater flexibility in Digital Data" this is entirely open ended. Moving wide data to where wide modes are used is of course a good idea. On 2/26/2014 1
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00334.html (8,867 bytes)

160. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted (score: 1)
Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:32:34 -0800
As fairly major users of the Digital spectrum perhaps we should get together and put together our own Band Plan anticipating the changes that no doubt will be forth coming. Perhaps its time to form a
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00369.html (8,021 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]
This search system is powered by Namazu