Mail Archive Search: <+from:wo4o.radio@gmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:wo4o.radio@gmail.com: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes published (score: 1): Author: "wo4o - RiC" <wo4o.radio@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:54:46 -0500; Ah, those were the good ole days! 73, de ric, wo4o Perhaps ARRL needs to beef up the OO program and start issuing "cards" again for bad operating. Then the Commission can go back to the old days and; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00246.html (10,296 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] wo4o This Weekend (score: 1): Author: "wo4o - RiC" <wo4o.radio@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:14:58 -0500; wo4o will be QRV. There is only one number in WO4O and it is a 4. N0 ZER0s. N0ne. Nada. Zilch. 73, de ric, wo4o Since this is the CQWW WPX contest this weekend, I will be using WW7RY and NOT W7RY. If; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00061.html (8,445 bytes)
3. [RTTY] RTTY w/ FSK using TS590S (score: 1): Author: "wo4o - RiC" <wo4o.radio@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:15:00 -0500; Having successfully configured and operated Afsk with the Kenwood TS-590S using the USB Audio CODEC, I prefer to operate FSK. Anybody here operating FSK with the following list of hardware and softwa; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00133.html (10,379 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules (score: 1): Author: "wo4o - RiC" <wo4o.radio@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:54:47 -0500; Are there older transceivers (exciter alone) capable of more than 100 w output (no "external amplifier") for RTTY. That okay? <smile> 73, de ric, wo4o Quoting from the NAQP rules: "Use of external am; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00155.html (8,574 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules (score: 1): Author: "wo4o - RiC" <wo4o.radio@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:25:17 -0500; If the rule explicitly states "external amplifiers" WHY would "someone using a transceiver that runs 200 or 400 watts" be accused of or convicted of cheating? Perhaps the rule should be changed? Just; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00158.html (10,500 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules (score: 1): Author: "wo4o - RiC" <wo4o.radio@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:34:31 -0500; Hey, Tom: Understood. Prior to my previous email I had not revisited the rules to read the exact wording in the correct context. The email to which I respond excluded part of the wording. Now, having; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00162.html (10,402 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules (score: 1): Author: "wo4o - RiC" <wo4o.radio@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:38:33 -0500; "6. Output Power: No greater than 100 W. Use of external amplifiers capable of more than 100 W output is not allowed. QRP (5 W) entries will be recognized in the results. Entries from stations choosi; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-02/msg00186.html (9,255 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]