- 1. Re: [RTTY] What's Happening?? (score: 1)
- Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:29:28 -0800
- The FCC specifies some very simple rules for our valued hobby: Frequencies where modes are authorized. Frequencies where you can operate those modes based upon your class of license. Power limits. N
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00005.html (7,035 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Stateside QSL Bureau (score: 1)
- Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:13:47 -0800
- No. - RTFM: Outgoing - ARRL membership required. http://www.arrl.org/qsl/qslout.html "The ARRL QSL Service cannot be used to exchange QSL cards within the 48 contiguous states." Incoming "The servic
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00334.html (8,298 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Stateside QSL Bureau (score: 1)
- Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:57:24 -0800
- _________ They are dependent by design. The League receives the incoming DX cards and pays for the labor to sort and package the cards that go to the district bureau volunteers. The League also pays
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-12/msg00344.html (9,414 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] 250 Hz Filters (score: 1)
- Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:56:30 -0800
- All I can say about filters is that its nearly a requirement now for 250 Hz filters and even then its elbows to knees so to speak on 20 Meters. Hopefully when 10 returns at least it will spread out s
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00241.html (6,989 bytes)
- 5. [RTTY] 850 v 170 Hz shift (score: 1)
- Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:48:25 -0800
- I received this from, Floyd, K8AC, re: 850 vs 170 Hz shift. It seems routed in things like why it's USB on some bands and LSB on others and how 50 ohms became the antenna standard. It was based on wh
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00258.html (8,222 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] Bangladesh active tomorrow (score: 1)
- Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:50:08 -0800
- S21DX _________________ Info here: http://s2iota.eb7dx.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=46&Itemid=56 Steve WB6RSE GL _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00381.html (6,695 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] trying to understand afsk (score: 1)
- Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:47:50 -0800
- I use cocoaModem AFSK on a Mac in USB mainly because I've become very accustomed to USB CW tones, operating CW for many years. IE "up" DX splits are higher tones when searching for "the spot." I set
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00113.html (8,600 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] Fun, but (score: 1)
- Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
- Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:09:16 -0800
- With today's modern rigs, there is no excuse for not using FSK. 73 Jim W7RY ____ You mean not to use AFSK? My AFSK setup is simplicity in both hardware interface and use. A poorly adjusted AFSK signa
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00027.html (8,653 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] Fun, but (score: 1)
- Author: wb6rse1@mac.com
- Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:46:59 -0800
- How is the poorly adjusted AFSK obvious unless you have a scope? ______ You can hear it just like you can hear an overdriven SSB signal several KC away. If you have a program with a RTTY waterfall di
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00035.html (8,595 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] Fun, but (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Lawrence <wb6rse1@mac.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 17:32:28 -0800
- If you listen close enough you can tell the difference by ear. Find one of each on the air which is strong and no noise present. 73 Charles/kk5oq ________ Yes, I'm sure there are some who think they
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00057.html (9,324 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu